Following arrest, agents can promise an arrestee only that in exchange for cooperation, they will not have to do jail time!
Group of answer choices

Answer: There are several rights assigned with the arrestee or prisoner.

Explanation:

The following are the rights of the prisoner:

1. The statement given by the prisoner cannot be recorded and but can be used to get leads as people under the police pressure make false statements.

2. The prisoner cannot be taken into remand or no physical offense is allowed.

During the exchange for the cooperation the prisoner can expect that there will be no physical violence against him or her during interrogation.

Read the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed . . . and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have [the opportunity] for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

What part of the Sixth Amendment suggests that accused persons will be able to hear the charges against them?

What does grave injustice mean?​

A meeting could begin as a lawful assembly but
develop into an unlawful one.

True
False

Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is an internal function of a business's accounting
department?
O A. Coordinating accounts receivable
O B. Administering employee payroll
C. Coordinating accounts payable
OD. Managing credit and collections accounts

Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your iPhone to secretly record a conversation with him where he admits that he did, in fact, steal the shirts. He is awaiting trial, and you bring the recording to the police station to submit it as evidence. In your state, it is illegal to use a secretly recorded conversation in a court of law. In other words, this piece of evidence is inadmissible. Do you agree with this rule? In your answer, define the exclusionary rule and doctrine of fruit of the poisonous tree, and explain how these terms apply to your situation.

There were more than__________ people injured in alcohol-related crashes in Florida

what is delegated legislation ​

Is the historian, Arthur Schlesinger, the one who wrote about the powers in government, the SR. or Jr. ? I need to know this for an assignment I'm doing that doesn't say which he is.

if you were the chairman of Nepal Disabled women Association what plan would you make for the Disabled women's welfare and make them independent? prepare a detail plan.​

Pls only put the answer nothing other than that

William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.

If a truck is ahead in the left lane with a right turn signal on, stay away from its ___________ side.

Which Executive Branch department is the most important? Use specific and relevant evidnce to support your argument Respond to at least one other post

Activity 1: The Takings Clause - Read the following excerpt from the Fifth Amendment and define the terms below IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Then, brainstorm ideas of things that could be considered “public use” (at least 3).

No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

“due process of law”
“Taking”
eminent domain
“public use”
“just compensation”
Examples of things that could be considered “public use”





Activity 2: Read the excerpts below and summarize.

What Does the Fifth Amendment Guarantee?
“Among other things, the Fifth Amendment guarantees that people have the right to their lives, liberty, and property. The government is not allowed to take those things without a reason or without following due process. Due process means that the government must act fairly and obey
legal procedures when it tries to take property. The just compensation clause of the Fifth Amendment means the federal government must pay for any private property it takes for public use.”

Summarize: what does the Fifth Amendment guarantee?

What Is a Taking?
“Although the Constitution protects private property, the government can sometimes seize or restrict the use of that property. It can take property in the name of the public good. This is called a taking.”

Summarize: what is a taking?

What Is Eminent Domain?
“The Founders realized they must reconcile [consider both] the need to sometimes take property for government use and individuals’ rights to use their own property. Sometimes the government needs land to build a road, school, post office, or military base. Historically, most takings happened through eminent domain. Eminent domain refers to the government’s right to take private property for public use. In the 1800s, eminent domain was used to claim land for railroads. In the twentieth century, it was used to remove residents from land along planned interstate highway routes. Even in cases of eminent domain, the government must provide
just compensation.”

Summarize: what is eminent domain?

What Is Just Compensation?
“Individuals can sue the government to be reimbursed [paid back] for the lost value of their property. They are asking for just compensation. It is often difficult to determine the amount
of just compensation. Today, the Supreme Court generally uses the fair market value standard, defining just compensation as “what a willing buyer would pay in cash to a willing seller at the time of the taking.”

Summarize: what is just compensation?

Activity 3: Read the three scenarios on handout C and answer the questions as they relate to EACH scenario.



Is the situation described a “taking” of property?
In the situation described, can the government claim Eminent Domain?
If so, what would be the best way to determine just compensation?
Scenario 1






Scenario 2






Scenario 3







Activity 4: Read handout D and answer the questions below.

In which case did the government attempt to take physical property?
In which case did the Court rule that a “taking” had occurred, even though no land was actually taken?
In which case did the Supreme Court interpret “public use” as “public benefit? Is there a difference?
How does the Kelo ruling differ from the other property rulings? Why do you think it has been a very controversial decision?
Is redevelopment through eminent domain the only way to revitalize a neighborhood? Is it the best way? What other methods can you think of?

Pls please if you do I will report you don’t put a random answer

Does that solve you question

Why must criminal statutes carefully and clearly define the prohibited behavior ?

Determine if the statement is true or false. The chain of custody document includes information about the location where a piece of evidence was found.


A. True

B. False​

Due to the stiffer penalties imposed for
"possession with intent" offenses, many states
forbid the inference of intent to deliver merely
on the basis of:

A.possession of a controlled substance.

B.eyewitness testimony.

C. undercover officers' testimony.

D.possession of both a substance and
paraphernalia.

Which statement describes one way the U.S. Constitution created a stronger federal government compared to the Articles of Confederation?

a.The federal government gained the power to disband state legislatures

b.The federal government gained the power to regulate trade between states.

c.The President of the United States gained the power to vote in the legislature.

d.The President of the United States gained the power to levy taxes on the states.

PLEASE LIKE RIGHT NOW ASAP