Answer:
I don't think it necessarily makes the narratives less believable, but it does present certain challenges in terms of accuracy and completeness. For example, some of the stories may have been embellished or simplified in order to make them more palatable to a white audience. Additionally, the fact that many of the interviewees were literate suggests that they were more likely to have been educated and/or privileged in some way, which may not be representative of the experiences of most slaves.
Explanation:
Answer:
I don’t think that narrative is unbelievable; I actually think it is accurate. Since it was confirmed by Mr. Parker himself. But I see why they would create a story like this, so that it creates a scenery as though slavery was not that bad,
Identify the beliefs of Protestants and the beliefs of Catholics.
believed that faith alone
could lead to salvation
believed that meditation,
prayer, and contemplation
exercises strengthened
one’s relationship with God
vowed absolute obedience
to the pope
viewed indulgences as a
morally and economically
corrupt practice
rejected the belief that people
couldn’t receive grace through
good works
taught that the Bible was
the only source of Christian
spiritual teachings
The believes of catholics include the following
vowed absolute obedience to the popebelieved that meditation, prayer, and contemplation exercises strengthened one’s relationship with God.The believes of Protestants include the following
believed that faith alone could lead to salvationviewed indulgences as a morally and economically corrupt practicetaught that the Bible was the only source of Christian spiritual teachings.What is CatholicismCatholicism is a Christian denomination headed by the pope. The spiritual capital of the catholic church is in Rome.
The catholic church is estimated to have about 1.3 billion adherents.
Learn more about the catholic church at https://brainly.com/question/19454692
#SPJ1
how is the case system related to hinduism?
The election of 2008 was historically significant for women because there were potentially two women on the final ballot. a third-party female candidate made a strong showing. women outnumbered male candidates for the senate. women outnumbered male candidates for the house.
The election of 2008 was significant for women because there were potentially two women on the final ballot.
What made the 2008 election significant for women?Women were potentially on the final ballot for the two major parties in the United States.
The two women were Sarah Palin (Republican) and Hillary Clinton (Democrat) and although they didn't win, they still went down in history for their roles in the 2008 elections.
Find out more on the 2008 Elections at https://brainly.com/question/6521398.
#SPJ1
The election of 2008 was historically significant for women because:
It was the first time that a woman, Hillary Clinton, won a major party's presidential primary contest.It was the first time that a woman, Sarah Palin, was nominated as a vice presidential candidate by the Republican Party.It was the first time that a woman of color, Michelle Obama, became the first lady of the United States.These events marked important milestones for women's representation and participation in American politics.
Question 8 of 29
What is the process of historical contextualization?
A. The effect of historical decisions on different cultural, political,
and socioeconomic groups
B. The discussion of what might have happened if a different
historical event had occurred
C. The examination of different factors that may have caused a
single historical event
D. The study of the political, social, cultural, and economic setting
surrounding a historical event
SUBMIT
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Comment
I think the best answer is D. If you look at an event by considering the social, economic, political, and religious backgrounds, you may come to realize why the event took place.
That reason given for D is the definition of of Historical Contextualization is the background circumstances that influenced the event taking place.
The Holy Roman Empire achievements and advancements????
Answer:
ancient Rome achievements: roman aqueduct, Colosseum, architecture, aqueduct, technology
Explanation:
What ended the Cuban Missile Crisis?
A) The Soviets removed its missiles from Cuba, and Kennedy agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.
B) The United Nations intervened and successfully negotiated a peaceful agreement.
C) The United States agreed that it was up to the Cuban government to allow or not allow the missiles.
D) An explosion in Caribbean waters scared all nations into limiting nuclear power.
What ended the Cuban missile crisis was : ( A ) The Soviets removed its missiles from Cuba, and Kennedy agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.
The Cuban missile crisisThe Cuban missile crisis was resolved peacefully when president Kennedy agreed to remove American missile from Italy and Turkey and and not to invade Cuba after Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev agreed to remove Soviet missiles from Cuba.
Hence we can conclude that What ended the Cuban missile crisis was The Soviets removed its missiles from Cuba, and Kennedy agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.
Learn more about Cuban missile crisis : https://brainly.com/question/457425
#SPJ1
Fearful that nationalist forces were really the work of Soviet communists, Eisenhower frequently intervened in Third World countries. Which country did Eisenhower not get involved in during his administration
In Angola Eisenhower did not get involved during his administration.
Who was Eisenhower?
The 34th president of the United States, Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower, was an American military officer and statesman who presided over the country from 1953 to 1961. He held the five-star rank of General of the Army during World War II while serving as Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe.
Marshall chose him to command American forces in the battle with Germany with over 400 senior officers. Eisenhower was chosen as the supreme commander of Operation Overlord, the Allied invasion of northwest Europe after he distinguished himself in the battlefields of North Africa and Italy in 1942 and 1943.
Learn more about Eisenhower here:
https://brainly.com/question/15725432
#SPJ4
In 1902, a famous pyroclastic flow killed approximately 28,000 people on the Caribbean island of ________.
Answer:
In 1902, a famous pyroclastic flow killed approximately 28,000 people on the Caribbean island of Martinique.
I hope this helps, L.E.
The collapse of the last chinese empire in 1912 was caused by the imperial government’s failure to.
Answer:
On February 12, 1912, Hsian-T'ung, the last emperor of China, is forced to abdicate following Sun Yat-sen's republican revolution. A provisional government was established in his place, ending 267 years of Manchu rule in China and 2,000 years of imperial rule.
What was the response of Charles I to the British parliament's Petition of Rights?
O He refused to sign it as a violation of his divine right to rule and dissolved parliament.
O He signed it and symbolically accepted constitutional monarchy.
O He signed it just to get treasury funds and then dismissed parliament and defied it.
O He ordered the members of parliament who presented it to be arrested.
The response of Charles I to the British parliament's Petition of Rights was A. He refused to sign it as a violation of his divine right to rule and dissolved parliament.
What was the Petition of Rights?The Petition of Rights was the constitutional protection of individual rights against the state.
Four principles were recognized in the Petition of Rights, including:
No taxation without the consent of ParliamentNo imprisonment without causeNo quartering of soldiers on subjectsNo martial law in peacetime.However, the Petition of Rights was not initially consented to by the King, who insisted on his royal powers to rule and deal without the parliament.
Thus, Charles I A. He refused to sign the British parliament's Petition of Rights and dissolved parliament.
Learn more about the Petition of Rights at https://brainly.com/question/618194
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. He signed it just to get treasury funds and then dismissed parliament and defied it.
Explanation: I took the test & got it right<3
In 1954, the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education
• overturned Plessy v. Ferguson by ruling segregation unconstitutional.
stated that African American and white schools needed to be equal.
upheld the Separate Car Act by ruling that segregation was legal.
upheld Plessy V. Ferguson by ruling segregation constitutional.
In 1954, the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education upheld Plessy V. Ferguson by ruling segregation constitutional. Hence, the correct answer is option D.
What was the Supreme Court's verdict in the case of Brown v. Board of Education?In the judgement delivered in 1954, Warren said 'In the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place' as 'segregated schools are inherently unequal'. Consequently, the court ruled that the complainants were were being deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14 Amendment.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about Brown v. Board of Education: https://brainly.com/question/481953
#SPJ1
Answer:
upheld Plessy v. Ferguson by ruling segregation constitutional.
D
Explanation:
edge 2023
What was one major accomplishment of the U.S. government under the Articles of Confederation
Why didn't the colonists want to pay taxes?
Answer:
Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes, because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens. The colonists started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods.
Answer:
They didn’t object to paying taxes. They objected to not having a say in determining what the taxes would be.
Explanation:
Early settlers in America fled from persecution due to economic, religious, and political reasons. They considered it unjust that they were required to pay taxes without being represented as former subjects of a constitutional monarchy. Later came to be the adage "No taxes without representation."
So, what was "No taxes without representation?"
It had its beginnings in the British Isles in the 17th century, a time of great political unrest and several conflicts, like a lot of contemporary American political thought.
The English Parliament passed the Bill of Rights in 1689 as justification for overthrowing King James II and installing his daughter Mary II and son-in-law William III in his place. It outlined its reasoning for deposing James and instituted new regulations. It stated:
"the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavor to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;...
...By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament."
It then declares, "for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties"
The Bill of Rights essentially seeks to strike a balance between the authority of the Crown (now the Prime Minister and Cabinet, formerly the King and/or Queen) and that of Parliament. It clearly states that Parliament has the right to impose taxes, not the Crown, and it proves that Parliament has the most power. [Fun fact: in an effort to tie the "crimes" of the British Government to what King James II was accused of, the US Declaration of Independence was modeled after the Bill of Rights.]
The political reasoning behind this was convoluted, but nearly a century later, when British-American colonists were defending their position on independence, this "ancient right and/or liberty"—which wasn't that old—was interpreted as a rule stating that only a Parliament—representing the people—could impose taxes. Additionally, the British Parliament had no authority to collect taxes on the American colonies since they had no direct representation in that body (the English and Scottish Parliaments amalgamated into one British Parliament in 1707).
Obviously, the Bill of Rights does not say that, but it is simple to understand how it can be construed that way. They concentrated on what they regarded to be the underlying idea of the text rather than the actual phrase, which makes it obvious that Parliament has the authority to impose taxes (that only representatives could raise tax). Thus, the straightforward political adage "no taxation without representation" was born; if a government is going to tax you, you should have a voice in it (unless you were poor, a woman, not-white, from Washington DC etc.).
Like a lot of political slogans it is a simple way of expressing a much more complicated concept.
Question
Type your response in the box.
In what ways did citizens on the home front contribute to the war effort? List any three contributions.
The ways that citizens on the home front contribute to the war effort are:
By adding to the food supply of the country via cultivating in the victory gardens.Been involved in the manufacturing of military goods and weapons.Buying of war bonds.How are citizens on the Homefront contribute to the war effort?A lot of Americans aided the war effort by buying a lot of war bonds. Women were known to have replaced men in regards to sports leagues, orchestras and also in some community institutions.
Note therefore, The ways that citizens on the home front contribute to the war effort are:
By adding to the food supply of the country via cultivating in the victory gardens.Been involved in the manufacturing of military goods and weapons.Buying of war bonds.Learn more about war effort from
https://brainly.com/question/8535233
#SPJ1
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes which basic rights? Check all that apply.
freedom of religion
right to a fair trial
right to live in a democracy
right to punish violators
freedom from slavery
right to government participation
Answer:
1st, 2nd and 5th
Explanation:
ok i know this isnt a huge help but all i know for sure is that freedom of religion and freedom to a free trial is true.
What happened to the money in the Second National Bank after the bank was dissolved by President Jackson?
After the Second National Bank was dissolved by President Jackson, the money forfeited was given to state banks.
What is the Second National Bank?The Second National Bank of the United States of America was established and chartered by the US Congress in 1816 after the charter of the First Bank of the United States had expired.
President Andrew Jackson announced officially on the 10th of September, 1833, that the federal government would no longer use or require the services of the Second National Bank of the United States of America and as such it failed to secure a re-charter.
Consequently, the money forfeited was given to state banks after the Second National Bank was dissolved by President Jackson.
Read more on Second National Bank here: https://brainly.com/question/21609144
#SPJ1
HELPP PLSS! its about US History
1:H
2:J
3:B
4:E
5:A
6: F
7:I
8: C
9:G
10:D
What was one major outcome of the first opium war ?
A major outcome of the First Opium War between China and Britain was B. China ceded Hong Kong to Great Britain.
What was the first Opium War?The First Opium War followed the Chinese government's efforts to suppress the illegal opium trade.
The Opium trade championed by Britain caused widespread drug addiction in China and serious social and economic disruptions.
Britain and the Qing dynasty engaged in military confrontations between 1839 and 1842. But after winning the battle, China ceded more powers to Britain by providing more treaty ports for increased opium trade and ceded Hong Kong to Britain.
Answer Options from Searches:A. China was forced to reduce its restrictions on British trade.
B. China ceded Hong Kong to Great Britain.
C. Britain left China alone.
D. Britain colonized China.
Thus, a major outcome of the First Opium War between China and Britain was B. China ceded Hong Kong to Great Britain.
Learn more about the First Opium War at https://brainly.com/question/12716623
#SPJ1
How was spartan and Athenian governments different
Answer:
Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by archons, who were elected annually. Thus, because both parts of Athens' government had leaders who were elected, Athens is said to have been the birthplace of democracy.
Sparta:
The five "Eforoi," who were actually in charge at Sparta, were chosen and merely need to justify their decisions to and be subject to the authority of the following "Eforoi." The choice was approved by "Apella". The body of adult Spartans known as "Apella" had little actual political influence other than via voice ratification of officials and vocal acceptance of legislation (easily manipulated). If not restrained, the two monarchs were little more than hereditary leaders of the army. They created the laws and ensured that they were followed by "Gerousia". The person who inspired this system was Lykourgos, who may have been an imaginary being.
In Athens, the "Ecclesia of Dhmos," which was composed of all adult males and cast a vote with a psifos (really a stone), was in charge of making important decisions. There was also the "Vouli of the 500," which was composed of voters and used to pass legislation. For more serious offenses, the legal system was the "Iliea" and "Areios Pagos." Additionally, the "10 Arxontes" were redirected and mostly made donations to their individual offices. Clesthenes was the latest to update and implement the system via significant adjustments.
Which country played a much more minor role in the second wave of European conquests in the long nineteenth century than it had played in the first wave during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
Spain is the country that played a much more minor role in the second wave of European conquests in the long nineteenth century.
What was the European Conquest in the nineteenth century?This is the term that is used to refer to the colonization of new territories that was done by the people of Europe in this time period.
Unlike the 16th century where people like Columbus led the European expedition Spain did not take part in this.
Read more on the European conquest here:
https://brainly.com/question/15295180
#SPJ1
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
Consequences for Not Repaying a Loan
Expensive fees
Lower credit score
A. Prison sentences
B. Lower interest rates
C. Seized possessions
D Losing a job
The consequences of not repaying a loan would be lower credit scores. Hence, Option D is the correct statement.
What is the result of non-payment of loan amount?The customer owes extra cash as penalties, fees, and interest costs building up in the account as a result. The credit score rankings can even fall.
It can also additionally take numerous years to recover, however, the customer can rebuild their credit score and borrow again, every now and then after only a few years.
The complete question is given below:
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
- Consequences for not repaying a loan
+ Expensive fees
+ Seized possessions
+ ____________________________
A. Prison sentences
B. Losing a job
C. lower interest rates
D. lower credit score
Thus, The consequences of not repaying a loan would be lower credit scores. Hence, Option D is the correct statement.
learn more about non-payment of loans:
https://brainly.com/question/27332135
#SPJ1
Answer:
answer would be c seized possession
Explanation:
in my box that part is not missing and the part I need is not missing in this person box
The Mongols a. made use of Chinese institutions in governing China. b. destroyed the Chinese economy by outlawing all trade. c. were, under Genghis Khan, aggressive traders virtually obsessed with making profits. d. established their capital in China at Nanjing. e. ruled China, by means of the Yuan Dynasty, for four hundred and thirty-seven years.
Answer:
Government Structure
The Mongol Empire was ruled with absolute authority by the khans. All of them except Genghis Khan and the son who succeeded him, Ögödei Khan (1185–1241), were elected by the Kurultai, who served as a consultative body for the ruler.
And answer is A
restate the accusations Hamlet makes against Claudius and
against his mother.
The accusation Ryan Hamlet makes against Claudius and against his mother is that they were accused of lustfulness and responsible for the death of the king.
How to depict the information?It should be noted that Hamlet is a story that was written by Shakespeare.
In this case, the accusation Ryan Hamlet makes against Claudius and against his mother is that they were accused of lustfulness and responsible for the death of the king.
Learn more about Hamlet on:
brainly.com/question/806658
#SPJ1
Why was the nobel peace prize awarded to u. S. President theodore roosevelt in 1906?.
The Nobel Peace Prize 1906 was awarded to Theodore Roosevelt "for his role in bringing to an end the bloody war recently waged between two of the world's great powers, Japan and Russia."
Theodore Roosevelt, President of the USA, received the Peace Prize for having negotiated peace in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-5. He also resolved a dispute with Mexico by resorting to arbitration as recommended by the peace movement.
Roosevelt was the first statesman to be awarded the Peace Prize, and for the first time, the award was controversial. The Norwegian Left argued that Roosevelt was a “military mad” imperialist who completed the American conquest of the Philippines. Swedish newspapers wrote that Alfred Nobel was turning in his grave and that Norway awarded the Peace Prize to Roosevelt in order to win powerful friends after the dramatic dissolution of the union with Sweden the previous year.
In domestic policy, Roosevelt was a radical within the Republican Party. He went in for social reforms and for state control of big capital. Roosevelt's term as President ended in 1908. During World War I. He tried in vain to be allowed to serve as an officer, and in 1919 he opposed US membership in the new League of Nations.
Learn more about Roosevelt at
https://brainly.com/question/2066305
#SPJ4
Write two diary entries, each from the perspective of a 19th-century woman concerned about her
rights.
• One diary entry should be written from the perspective of a factory worker living in the United States
in the mid-19th century. Write an entry in which she reflects on the status of women and summarizes
what she has heard about the recent Seneca Falls Convention. (5 points)
• The second diary entry should be from the perspective of a British woman in the early 1900s who is
interested in winning suffrage. Write an entry in which she reflects on whether to join the National
Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) or the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU)
and discusses the pros and cons of each group.
Dairy one: The perspective of a factory worker living in the United States in the mid-19th century.
Life in the mid 19th century as a factory worker was not an easy one. It was one where we as women had to work for about 12 -14 hours every day. Due to the hours of work, we are always prone to brutal discipline if one of us made mistakes, Punishments such as beatings, and others.Women in mid-19th century felt happy and elevated about Seneca Falls Convention as they want and are fighting for their right to vote.
Dairy Two: the perspective of a British woman in the early 1900s who is interested in winning suffrageLife for women in the 1900 is onw where Women were seen and taken to often subservient to their fathers and husbands and they are often limited in terms of occupational choices.
In early 1900s, women and women's organizations were said to have fight for the right of women to to vote.
They function in terms of good or broad based economic and also political equality for all women as well as other social reforms.
She want to join the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) as she believed in what they stood for.
Learn more about suffrage from
https://brainly.com/question/8862360
#SPJ1
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, authors
of the "Communist Manifesto," followed
what ideology?
A. conservatism
C. capitalism
B. utilitarianism
D. socialism
that answer will be utilitarianism
Answer:
D. socialism
Explanation:
Where did the ideas of "Freedom of the
Seas" come from at the end of World War
I?
A. Roosevelt's Day of Infamy Speech
B. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address
C. Roosevelt's Rough Riders
D. Wilson's "Fourteen Points"
The answer is A. "Seas" refers to the acronym for the four major bodies of water in East Asia: South China Sea, East China Sea, and Sea of Japan. Hence option A is correct .
Where did the ideas of "Freedom of theSeas" come from at the end of World War I ?These seas were not mentioned in any of the options except for Roosevelt's Day of Infamy Speech. This speech was delivered on December 8, 1941, the day after the surprise attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor. In his speech, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared that the attack was "a date which will live in infamy" and called on Congress to declare war on Japan.
He also mentioned the Japanese aggression in East Asia, including their attacks on China and the seizure of territory in Indochina. It was in this context that the acronym "SEAS" was first coined, to refer to the bodies of water that were critical to Japan's expansionist ambitions in the region.
Thus option A is correct .
Learn more about "Freedom of the Seas" here
https://brainly.com/question/14393562
#SPJ2
In Johnson v. McIntosh (1823), the Marshall Court ruled that Native Americans had a basic right to their lands and that only ______ had the right to acquire those lands from them.
The Marshall Court ruled that only the Federal government had the right to acquire those lands from them.
What is the case of Johnson v. McIntosh?This particular case upholds the McIntosh ownership of land purchased from the federal government since the federal government now controls the land.
Before the supreme judgement, the Marshall Court ruled that only the Federal government had the right to acquire those lands from them.
Read more about Johnson v. McIntosh
brainly.com/question/6241021
#SPJ1
What caused the february revolution of 1917? people were angry because of the tsar’s poor leadership. lenin’s idea of a classless society induced people to revolt. protests against food and coal shortages turned into riots. the duma rose up against the autocratic russian monarchy.
Answer:
C. Protests against food and coal shortages turned into riots
Explanation:
Hope this helps
please help me 45 point to whoever
Answer:
l can offer maybe 10 points