draw the structure that corresponds to the following information: molecular formula: c7h8c7h8 proton-decoupled c13c13 nmr: δ 21.3, δ 125.7, δ 128.6, δ 129.0, δ 138.4 ppm.

Approximately 17.58 grams of silver metal will be produced from Ag⁺(aq) in 1.25 hours with a current of 3.50 A.

Silver metal refers to the elemental form of silver, which is a chemical element with the symbol Ag and atomic number 47. It is a lustrous, white, and highly reflective metal known for its excellent electrical and thermal conductivity.

To calculate the mass of silver produced, we can use Faraday's law of electrolysis. The equation is: m = (Q * M) / (n * F)

where:

m is the mass of the substance produced (in grams)

Q is the quantity of electric charge (in coulombs)

M is the molar mass of the substance (in grams/mol)

n is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced equation for the reaction

F is Faraday's constant, which is 96,500 C/mol

In this case, we want to find the mass of silver produced from Ag⁺(aq) in 1.25 hours with a current of 3.50 A.

First, let's calculate the quantity of electric charge (Q):

Q = I * t

where:

I is the current in amperes (A)

t is the time in seconds (s)

Given:

Current (I) = 3.50 A

Time (t) = 1.25 hours = 1.25 * 3600 seconds (since 1 hour = 3600 seconds)

Q = 3.50 A * (1.25 * 3600 s) = 15,750 C

Next, we need to determine the number of moles of electrons transferred (n). Since the balanced equation for the reduction of Ag⁺ to

Ag involves the transfer of 1 mole of electrons, n = 1.

The molar mass of silver (Ag) is approximately 107.87 g/mol.

Now, we can plug the values into the formula:

m = (Q * M) / (n * F) = (15,750 C * 107.87 g/mol) / (1 * 96,500 C/mol)

Calculating this expression will give us the mass of silver produced:

m = (15,750 C * 107.87 g/mol) / (1 * 96,500 C/mol) ≈ 17.58 grams

Therefore, approximately 17.58 grams of silver metal will be produced from Ag⁺(aq) in 1.25 hours with a current of 3.50 A.

Know more about silver metal:

https://brainly.com/question/19168976

#SPJ6

Laughing gas is an oxide of nitrogen used as a propellant for whipped cream aerosols and also an inhalation anesthic and analgesic. N₂O is the  formula for laughing gas if it contains 63.65% N and has a density of 1.8g/L at 25 Celsius and 1atm.

The definition of an empirical formula for a compound is one that displays the ratio of the components present in the complex but not the precise number of atoms in the molecule. Subscripts are used next following the element symbols to indicate the ratios.

The subscripts in the empirical formula, which represent the ratio of the elements, are the smallest whole integers, making it referred to as the simplest formula.

Mass of N = 63.65 % = 63.65 g

Mass of O = 36.35 % = 36.35 g

Number of Moles of N = 63.65 g / 14.01 g/mol = 4.54 mol

Number of Moles of O = 36.35 g / 16.00 g/mol = 2.27 mol

N = 4.54 mol / 2.27 mol = 2

O = 2.27 mol / 2.27 mol = 1

Empirical formula = N₂O₁ = N₂O

To know more about empirical formula, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14044066

#SPJ1

The structures of the epoxides would obtain by formation of a bromohydrin from trans-2-pentene are (2R,3S)-trans-2-bromo-3-methylcyclohexan-1-ol epoxide or (2S,3R)-trans-2-bromo-3-methylcyclohexan-1-ol epoxide.

To form a bromohydrin from trans-2-pentene, we would add Br₂ and H₂O to the double bond, resulting in the formation of a trans-2-bromopentan-1-ol intermediate. This intermediate can then undergo intramolecular nucleophilic substitution, resulting in the formation of an epoxide.

The structure of the epoxide obtained from this reaction would be:

(2R,3S)-trans-2-bromo-3-methylcyclohexan-1-ol epoxide

or

(2S,3R)-trans-2-bromo-3-methylcyclohexan-1-ol epoxide

These are the two enantiomers of the racemic mixture that would be obtained. The stereochemistry of the epoxide is determined by the stereochemistry of the bromohydrin intermediate, which has a trans configuration. The wedge and dash bonds indicate the stereochemistry of the substituents on the cyclohexane ring and the epoxide oxygen.

Learn more about bromohydrin: https://brainly.com/question/31458627

#SPJ11

The pH after the addition of each volume of acid is: (a) 11.72, (b) 3.15, (c) 2.28.

The reaction between NaOH and HCl is a neutralization reaction, which produces NaCl and H2O. In this reaction, the acid (HCl) reacts with the base (NaOH) to form water and a salt.

To calculate the pH after the addition of each volume of acid, we need to use the stoichiometry of the reaction and the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. The initial concentration of NaOH is 0.116 M, and the initial volume is 50.0 mL. The volume of HCl added at each step is:

(a) 5.0 mL: The total volume is 55.0 mL. The number of moles of HCl added is 0.0750 M x 0.0050 L = 3.75 x 10^-4 mol. The number of moles of NaOH is 0.116 M x 0.0500 L = 5.80 x 10^-3 mol. After the reaction, the number of moles of NaOH remaining is 5.80 x 10^-3 mol - 3.75 x 10^-4 mol = 5.43 x 10^-3 mol.

The concentration of NaOH is 5.43 x 10^-3 mol / 0.055 L = 0.099 M. The pH is calculated using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation: pH = pKa + log([A-]/[HA]), where pKa is the dissociation constant of water (14), [A-] is the concentration of the conjugate base (Na+), and [HA] is the concentration of the acid (H2O).

The pH after the addition of 5.0 mL of HCl is 11.72.

(b) 50 mL: The total volume is 100.0 mL. The number of moles of HCl added is 0.0750 M x 0.0500 L = 3.75 x 10^-3 mol. The number of moles of NaOH is 0.116 M x 0.0500 L = 5.80 x 10^-3 mol. After the reaction, the number of moles of HCl remaining is 3.75 x 10^-3 mol - 5.80 x 10^-3 mol = -2.05 x 10^-3 mol.

The concentration of HCl is -2.05 x 10^-3 mol / 0.100 L = -0.0205 M (negative because there is excess base). The pH is calculated using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, and the pH after the addition of 50 mL of HCl is 3.15.

(c) 0.10 L: The total volume is 150.0 mL. The number of moles of HCl added is 0.0750 M x 0.1000 L = 7.50 x 10^-3 mol. The number of moles of NaOH is 0.116 M x 0.0500 L = 5.80 x 10^-3 mol. After the reaction, the number of moles of HCl remaining is 7.50 x 10^-3 mol - 5.80 x 10^-3 mol = 1.70 x 10^-3 mol. The concentration of HCl is 1.70 x 10^-3 mol / 0.

For more questions like Reaction click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30086875

#SPJ11

A total of 4.047 grams of aluminum is reacted.

The equation for the reaction between KOH and aluminum is 2Al + 2KOH + 6H₂O -> 2KAl(OH)₄ + 3H₂.

From this equation, we can see that 2 moles of aluminum react with 2 moles of KOH. Therefore, if 30.00 ml of 5.00 M KOH reacted completely, then there were 0.15 moles of KOH used.

And since the molar ratio of aluminum to KOH is 1:1, then 0.15 moles of aluminum reacted. To find the mass of aluminum that reacted, we can use the molar mass of aluminum, which is 26.98 g/mol. Thus, the mass of aluminum that reacted is 0.15 moles x 26.98 g/mol = 4.047 g.

In summary, if 30.00 ml of 5.00 M KOH reacted completely, then 0.15 moles of aluminum reacted. Using the molar mass of aluminum, we can calculate that the mass of aluminum that reacted is 4.047 g. This calculation is based on the molar ratio of aluminum to KOH in the balanced chemical equation for the reaction.

To know more about molar ratio click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/17920577#

#SPJ11

The pH of the solution containing 0.030 M NaOH and 0.045 M KI is 10.65 neglecting activities and 10.77 including activities.

To determine the pH of a solution containing 0.030 M NaOH and 0.045 M KI:

First, we need to write the balanced chemical equation for the reaction that occurs when NaOH and KI are dissolved in water:

NaOH + HI → NaI + H2O

The hydroxide ions from NaOH will react with the hydrogen ions from water to form more water and hydroxide ions, according to the following equilibrium:

OH- + H2O ⇌ H3O+

We can use the concentrations of NaOH and KI to calculate the concentrations of the various ions in the solution. Since NaOH is a strong base, we can assume that it dissociates completely in water:

Since KI is a salt of a weak acid, we need to use the acid dissociation constant (Ka) of HI to calculate the concentration of hydrogen ions (H+) in the solution:

To determine the pH of the solution, we need to calculate the concentration of hydrogen ions ([H+]) and take the negative logarithm:

pH = -log[H+]

Substituting the expression for [H+] derived above, we get:

pH = -log(1.0 x 10⁻¹⁰ * 0.045 M / [I-])

Neglecting activities, we can assume that the iodide ions are the only other ions present in the solution, and their concentration is equal to the concentration of KI:

[I-] = 0.045 M

Substituting this value into the expression for pH, we get:

pH = -log(1.0 x 10⁻¹⁰ * 0.045 M / 0.045 M) = 10.65

To determine the pH of the solution including activities, we need to use the activity coefficients of the ions. From the table provided, so we need to multiply the concentration of iodide ions by the activity coefficient:

[I-] = 0.045 M * 0.788 = 0.0355 M

Substituting this value into the expression for pH, we get:

pH = -log(1.0 x 10⁻¹⁰ * 0.045 M / 0.0355 M) = 10.77

Therefore, the pH of the solution containing 0.030 M NaOH and 0.045 M KI is 10.65 neglecting activities and 10.77 including activities.

Learn more about negative logarithm

brainly.com/question/3072484

#SPJ11

Answer:

Mg(s) + 2HCl(ac) -> MgCl2(ac) + H2(g)

Answer:

Explanation:

d. Increase the temperature. According to Le Chatelier's principle, increasing the temperature of an endothermic reaction shifts the equilibrium towards the products to absorb the excess heat. In this case, the forward reaction is endothermic, as it requires energy to form NO2 from NO and O2. Therefore, increasing the temperature will favor the forward reaction and increase the amount of product formed.

To increase the amount of product NO2(g) and shift the equilibrium position right, we can:

c. Remove some NO2(g)

This will drive the equilibrium right to produce more NO2(g) according to Le Chatelier's principle.

The other options will not have the desired effect:

a. Reducing pressure will not impact the equilibrium position.

b. Increasing volume will slightly favor the forward reaction but the effect will be small.

d. Increasing temperature can either drive the equilibrium right or left depending on where the equilibrium currently lies. Without knowing the initial conditions, we cannot determine the effect.

So the correct choice is c. Remove some NO2(g). This is a common technique used industrially to maximize product yield, known as Le Chatelier's equilibrium shift.

Let me know if you have any other questions!

Carbon tetraiodide and PBr3 are covalent molecule whereas KBr and Iron (III) Oxide are ionic molecule.

When two non-metals or one non-metal are joined together by sharing a pair of electrons, the resulting combination is called a covalent compound.

Because phosphorus contains three valence electrons in its outer shell and is located in column 3 of the periodic table, PBr3 is covalent. As a result, both the elements in Carbon Tetraiodide—carbon and iodide—are non-metals, making them covalent compounds.

Due to the interaction between a metal and a non-metal, KBr and Iron (III) Oxide are both Iron (III) Oxides. From positively charged to negatively charged atoms, they will transfer the electrons.

To know about covalent compound

https://brainly.com/question/30420584

#SPJ4

The complete question is

Determine whether each of the following compounds is a molecular compound or an ionic compound. How can you tell?

a. ) PBr₃

b. ) KBr

c. ) Iron (III) Oxide

d. ) Carbon Tetraiodide

Receptors, sensory neurons, are two of the five fundamental parts of most reflex arcs. ATP is a transmitter or cotransmitter that neurons release as an extracellular substance. P2X receptors are extracellular ATP-gated nonselective cation channels.

They serve as conduits and new therapeutic targets.  P2X receptors' basic sequence has very little in common with other ligand-gated ion channels. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are the primary mechanism by which nicotine, the most addictive component of tobacco, causes dependence. Neuronal circuits can respond quickly to incoming data because glutamatergic synaptic transmission happens on a millisecond period.

To know more about cotransmitter, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14477607

#SPJ4

The molar enthalpy of neutralisation can be determined using the HCN experiment findings shown in the graph above. The enthalpy change per mole of a chemical that dissolves in water to form a solution can be calculated using the formula q = mcT.

A neutralisation reaction takes place when an acid and an alkali interact. Per mole of water produced during the neutralisation reaction, the enthalpy change can be determined. Strong bases (NaOH) and acids (HCl) have an enthalpy of neutralisation of -55.84 kJ/mol. Enthalpy of neutralisation is the amount of heat generated when a base in diluted solution completely neutralises one gramme equivalent of acid.

To know more about enthalpy, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16720480

#SPJ4

The limiting reagent in the reaction, which can only create 0.4 mol of PbCl3, limits the amount of that metal that can be produced.

The reaction between Pb and Cl2 has the following balanced equation:

2Cl2 + Pb = PbCl4

The limiting reagent is the one that runs out first since the reaction needs 2 moles of Cl2 for every 1 mole of Pb. Because it is present in the smallest amount (0.4 mol) while Cl2 is present in excess (0.5 mol), Pb is the limiting reagent in this instance. Therefore, even though there is more than enough Cl2 to react with all of the Pb, only 0.4 mol of PbCl3 can be generated. Since the reaction needs two moles of Cl2 for every one mole of Pb, the limiting reagent will be the one that runs out first. Pb is the limiting reagent in this instance because it is present in the smallest concentration (0.4 mol), whereas Cl2 is present in excess (0.5 mol). Even though there is more than enough Cl2 for all of the Pb to react, only 0.4 mol of PbCl3 can be created as a result.

learn more about moles here:

https://brainly.com/question/26416088

#SPJ11

Given two similarly-sized containers that contain identical gases  at identical temperatures, if the pressure within one container is double that of the other, then consequently, the amount or quantity of gas within the higher-pressure receptacle must be twice as much.

This phenomenon can be explained using the renowned ideal gas law which remarkably affirms:

PV = nRT,

where P stands for the pressure, V for volume, n for mole number of the gas, R for a special constant and T for temperature.

Read more on gas laws here:https://brainly.com/question/4147359

#SPJ1

Given two similarly-sized containers that contain identical gases  at identical temperatures, if the pressure within one container is double that of the other, then consequently, the amount or quantity of gas within the higher-pressure receptacle must be twice as much.

This phenomenon can be explained using the renowned ideal gas law which remarkably affirms:

PV = nRT,

where P stands for the pressure, V for volume, n for mole number of the gas, R for a special constant and T for temperature.

Read more on gas laws here:https://brainly.com/question/4147359

#SPJ1

The C-O bonds in the carbonate ion (CO₃²⁻) have a bond order of 1.33, are longer compared to the C-O bonds in CO₂, and are weaker due to the presence of the additional negative charge on the carbonate ion.

The carbonate ion (CO₃²⁻) has three C-O bonds, each with a bond order of 1.33. The bond order is calculated as the difference between the number of bonding electrons and the number of antibonding electrons, divided by 2. In the carbonate ion, there are four bonding electrons and two antibonding electrons, resulting in a bond order of 1.33 for each C-O bond.

In terms of bond length, the C-O bonds in CO₃²⁻ are longer than the C-O bonds in CO₂. This is because the carbonate ion has a larger molecular size and more electron density, leading to longer bond lengths compared to the smaller CO₂ molecule.

In terms of bond strength, the C-O bonds in CO₃²⁻ are weaker than the C-O bonds in CO₂. This is due to the presence of an additional negative charge on the carbonate ion, which increases the electron density around the C-O bonds and reduces their strength. The increased electron density in the carbonate ion also leads to increased repulsion between the negatively charged oxygen atoms, further weakening the C-O bonds.

In contrast, in CO₂, the absence of the additional negative charge and the smaller molecular size result in stronger C-O bonds compared to CO₃²⁻.

You can learn more about carbonate ions at: brainly.com/question/13878773

#SPJ11

The given statement " 1 mole of glucose (C6H12O6(s)) has a greater entropy than 1 mole of sucrose (C12H22O11(s)) " is True. The given statement "ΔS for the following reaction is negative CH3OH(l) + 3/2 O2(g) => CO2(g) + 2 H2O(g)" is False

This is because glucose has a higher degree of molecular disorder than sucrose. Glucose has six carbon atoms, while sucrose has 12 carbon atoms arranged in a more ordered fashion.

Therefore, glucose molecules can adopt more arrangements than sucrose molecules, resulting in a greater degree of entropy.

The reaction involves the formation of carbon dioxide and water from methanol and oxygen. The formation of two moles of gas from one mole of liquid  and one and a half moles of gas  increases the degree of molecular disorder and randomness, resulting in a positive entropy change.

Therefore, the ΔS for this reaction is positive, not negative.

Know more about entropy here:

https://brainly.com/question/24278877

#SPJ11

NH₄ (Ammonium ion): Electronic Geometry: Tetrahedral. CH₂O (Formaldehyde): Electronic Geometry: Trigonal Planar. BeCl₂ (Beryllium chloride): Electronic Geometry: Linear. PF₅ (Phosphorus pentafluoride): Electronic Geometry: Trigonal Bipyramidal.

Classifying the given molecular formulas under their respective electronic geometries:

1. NH₄ (Ammonium ion):
Electronic Geometry: Tetrahedral
Reason: Nitrogen (N) has 5 valence electrons, and it forms 4 bonds with Hydrogen (H) atoms. Thus, the electron domain count is 4, resulting in a tetrahedral electronic geometry.

2. CH₂O (Formaldehyde):
Electronic Geometry: Trigonal Planar
Reason: Carbon (C) has 4 valence electrons, and it forms 3 bonds (2 with Hydrogen and 1 with Oxygen). Thus, the electron domain count is 3, resulting in a trigonal planar electronic geometry.

3. BeCl₂ (Beryllium chloride):
Electronic Geometry: Linear
Reason: Beryllium (Be) has 2 valence electrons, and it forms 2 bonds with Chlorine (Cl) atoms. Thus, the electron domain count is 2, resulting in a linear electronic geometry.

4. PF₅ (Phosphorus pentafluoride):
Electronic Geometry: Trigonal Bipyramidal
Reason: Phosphorus (P) has 5 valence electrons, and it forms 5 bonds with Fluorine (F) atoms. Thus, the electron domain count is 5, resulting in a trigonal bipyramidal electronic geometry.

More on electronic geometry: https://brainly.com/question/14789050

#SPJ11

A reactive intermediate is a short-lived, a chemical reaction and participates in subsequent steps. Its charge and electron configuration, a reactive intermediate can be classified as a radical, carbocation, or carbanion.

Homolysis refers to the breaking of a bond in a molecule such that each of the two resulting fragments retains one of the two electrons from the bond. This can result in the formation of two radicals, which are highly reactive species with an unpaired electron.
Heterolysis, on the other hand, refers to the breaking of a bond in a molecule such that one of the two resulting fragments retains both electrons from the bond, while the other fragment is left with none. This can result in the formation of a cation (if the fragment that retains the electrons has a positive charge) or an anion (if the fragment that retains the electrons has a negative charge).
Electronegativity is a measure of an atom's ability to attract electrons towards itself in a covalent bond. The greater the electronegativity difference between two atoms in a bond, the more polar the bond is, and the more likely it is to undergo heterolytic cleavage.
A radical has an unpaired electron and is neutral, while a carbocation is positively charged and has an empty orbital, and a carbanion is negatively charged and has a lone pair of electrons.

Learn more about carbocation here

https://brainly.com/question/29769725

#SPJ11

Answer:

AlCl₃

Explanation:

The observations in these experiments can be explained by the formation of different copper-ammonia complex ions, which resulted from the different order in which the reagents were added.

In the first experiment (a), when 10 mL of 8 M NH3 was added to the 25 mL 0.25 M CuCl2(aq) solution, it resulted in the formation of [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+ complex ion. When excess 2.0 M CuCl2 solution was added, it caused the formation of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ complex ion, which is a light blue precipitate. This reaction can be represented by the following equations:

CuCl2(aq) + 4NH3(aq) + 2H2O(l) → [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+(aq) + 2Cl^-(aq)
[Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+(aq) + 2CuCl2(aq) → 2[Cu(NH3)4]2+(aq) + 4Cl^-(aq) + 2H2O(l)

In the second experiment (b), when 5 mL of 2.0 M CuCl2 solution was added to the 25 mL 0.25 M CuCl2(aq) solution, it resulted in the formation of [Cu(H2O)6]2+ complex ion. When excess 8 M NH3 was added, it caused the formation of [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+ complex ion, which is a deep blue color. This reaction can be represented by the following equations:

CuCl2(aq) + 4H2O(l) → [Cu(H2O)6]2+(aq) + 2Cl^-(aq)
[Cu(H2O)6]2+(aq) + 4NH3(aq) → [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+(aq) + 4H2O(l)

In summary, the differences in the observations between the two experiments can be attributed to the different complex ions that were formed due to the different order in which the reagents were added. The first experiment resulted in the formation of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ complex ion, while the second experiment resulted in the formation of [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+ complex ion.

Know more about Complex Ion here:

https://brainly.com/question/31418041

#SPJ11

Baso4 is most soluble in a solution that is 0.10 m in na2so4.

This is because Na2SO4 is a soluble salt, which means it can dissolve in water to form a solution. When Na2SO4 dissolves in water, it dissociates into Na+ and SO4^{2-} ions. These ions can interact with the Ba2+ and SO4^{2-} ions in BaSO4 to form a more soluble compound. In contrast, Ba(NO3)2 and NaNO3 are also soluble salts, but they do not contain SO42- ions which can interact with BaSO4 to increase its solubility. Therefore, the presence of Na2SO4 in solution can increase the solubility of BaSO4.

learn more about solubility Refer: https://brainly.com/question/28170449

#SPJ11

Baso4 is most soluble in a solution that is 0.10 m in na2so4.

This is because Na2SO4 is a soluble salt, which means it can dissolve in water to form a solution. When Na2SO4 dissolves in water, it dissociates into Na+ and SO4^{2-} ions. These ions can interact with the Ba2+ and SO4^{2-} ions in BaSO4 to form a more soluble compound. In contrast, Ba(NO3)2 and NaNO3 are also soluble salts, but they do not contain SO42- ions which can interact with BaSO4 to increase its solubility. Therefore, the presence of Na2SO4 in solution can increase the solubility of BaSO4.

learn more about solubility Refer: https://brainly.com/question/28170449

#SPJ11

a) The solubility of PbF₂ is 0.426 g/L.

b) The solubility of Ag₂CO₃ is 2.98 x 10⁻⁴ g/L.

c) The solubility of Bi₂S₃ is 5.71 x 10⁻⁷⁰ g/L.

a) For PbF₂:

Ksp = [Pb²⁺][F⁻]² = 4.0 x 10⁻⁸

Let x be the molar solubility of PbF₂. Then, the equilibrium concentrations of Pb²⁺ and F⁻ are both equal to x. Substituting these values into the Ksp expression, we get:

Ksp = x(2x)² = 4x⁵

Solving for x, we get:

x = (Ksp/4)¹/⁵ = (4.0 x 10⁻⁸/4)¹/⁵ = 1.74 x 10⁻³ M

To calculate the solubility in g/L, we use the molar mass of PbF₂:

molar mass of PbF₂ = 207.2 g/mol + 2(18.998 g/mol) = 245.196 g/mol

solubility = molar solubility x molar mass = 1.74 x 10⁻³ M x 245.196 g/mol = 0.426 g/L

b) For Ag₂CO₃:

Ksp = [Ag⁺]₂[CO₃²⁻] = 8.1 x 10⁻¹²

Let x be the molar solubility of Ag₂CO₃. Then, the equilibrium concentrations of Ag⁺ and CO₃²⁻ are both equal to x. Substituting these values into the Ksp expression, we get:

Ksp = x² = 8.1 x 10⁻¹²

Solving for x, we get:

x = sqrt(Ksp) = sqrt(8.1 x 10⁻¹²) = 9.0 x 10⁻⁷ M

To calculate the solubility in g/L, we use the molar mass of Ag₂CO₃:

molar mass of Ag₂CO₃ = 2(107.8682 g/mol) + 1(12.0107 g/mol) + 3(15.9994 g/mol) = 331.124 g/mol

solubility = molar solubility x molar mass = 9.0 x 10⁻⁷ M x 331.124 g/mol = 2.98 x 10⁻⁴ g/L

c) For Bi₂S₃:

Ksp = [Bi³⁺]₂[S²⁻]₃ = 1.6 x 10⁻⁷²

Let x be the molar solubility of Bi₂S₃. Then, the equilibrium concentrations of Bi³⁺ and S²⁻ are both equal to 2x (because there are 2 Bi³⁺ ions and 3 S²⁻ ions in one formula unit of Bi₂S₃). Substituting these values into the Ksp expression, we get:

Ksp = (2x)²(3x)³ = 36x⁵

Solving for x, we get:

x = (Ksp/36)¹/⁵ = (1.6 x 10⁻⁷²/36)¹/⁵ = 5.01 x 10⁻⁶ M

To calculate the solubility in g/L, we use the molar mass of Bi₂S₃:

molar mass of Bi₂S₃ = 2(208.98 g/mol) + 3(32.06 g/mol)

solubility = molar solubility x molar mass = 1.6 x 10⁻⁷² M x 331.124 g/mol = 5.71 x 10⁻⁷⁰ g/L

To know more about radial molar solubility click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28170449#

#SPJ11

To find the partial pressure of CO2, we need to use the mole fraction of CO2 in the mixture. The partial pressure of CO2 in the mixture is 0.851 atm.

To find the partial pressure of CO2 in the mixture, we'll use Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures. First, let's find the total moles of the mixture:

Total moles = moles of CO + moles of CO2 + moles of Ne
Total moles = 0.220 + 0.350 + 0.640 = 1.210 moles

Now, we'll calculate the mole fraction of CO2:

Mole fraction of CO2 = moles of CO2 / total moles
Mole fraction of CO2 = 0.350 / 1.210 ≈ 0.289

Finally, we'll find the partial pressure of CO2:

Partial pressure of CO2 = mole fraction of CO2 × total pressure
Partial pressure of CO2 = 0.289 × 2.95 atm ≈ 0.853 atm

The partial pressure of CO2 in the mixture is approximately 0.853 atm.

Learn more about CO2 here: brainly.com/question/28870590

#SPJ11

The number of grams of solute in 422.0 mL of 0.205 M calcium acetate is approximately 13.68 grams.

To calculate the number of grams of solute in 422.0 mL of 0.205 M calcium acetate:

1. Convert the volume of the solution from mL to L:
422.0 mL × (1 L / 1000 mL) = 0.422 L

2. Use the molarity formula to find moles of solute:
Molarity (M) = moles of solute / liters of solution
0.205 M = moles of solute / 0.422 L
moles of solute = 0.205 M × 0.422 L = 0.08651 mol

3. Determine the molar mass of calcium acetate (Ca(C2H3O2)2):
Ca: 1 × 40.08 g/mol = 40.08 g/mol
C: 4 × 12.01 g/mol = 48.04 g/mol
H: 6 × 1.01 g/mol = 6.06 g/mol
O: 4 × 16.00 g/mol = 64.00 g/mol
Molar mass = 40.08 + 48.04 + 6.06 + 64.00 = 158.18 g/mol

4. Calculate the mass of solute in grams:
Mass = moles of solute × molar mass
Mass = 0.08651 mol × 158.18 g/mol = 13.68 g

Therefore approximately 13.68 grams is the number of grams of solute in 422.0 mL of 0.205 M calcium acetate.

More on solute grams: https://brainly.com/question/20688335

#SPJ11

By following these steps, you can accurately determine the concentration of the unknown metal ion in your sample while keeping the absorbance within the range of the standard solutions.

To rectify the discrepancy in the unknown metal ion concentration with an absorbance outside the range of the standard solutions, you should consider the following procedure:

1. Dilution: Dilute the unknown sample to bring its absorbance within the range of the standard solutions. This can be done by using a known volume of the sample and adding a suitable volume of diluent (e.g., distilled water). Record the dilution factor for later calculations.

2. Calibration curve: Prepare a new set of standard solutions with a broader range of concentrations to cover the absorbance of the unknown sample. Measure the absorbance of each standard solution and plot a new calibration curve, which shows the relationship between absorbance and concentration.

3. Reanalyze: Measure the absorbance of the diluted unknown sample and compare it to the newly created calibration curve. Determine the concentration of the metal ion in the diluted sample using the curve.

4. Calculate concentration: Multiply the concentration obtained in step 3 by the dilution factor to obtain the concentration of the metal ion in the original undiluted sample.

By following these steps, you can accurately determine the concentration of the unknown metal ion in your sample while keeping the absorbance within the range of the standard solutions.

Visit here to learn more about  concentration : https://brainly.com/question/10725862
#SPJ11

The general trend for atomic radius is that it decreases from left to right across a period and increases from top to bottom within a group in the periodic table. Therefore, we can use this trend to arrange the given elements in order of decreasing atomic radius.

The order of decreasing atomic radius for the given elements is as follows:

Cs > Sb > Tl > Se > S

Cs (cesium) has the largest atomic radius because it is located at the bottom left of the periodic table, which means it has the highest number of energy levels and electron shielding.

S (sulphur) has the smallest atomic radius because it is located at the top right of the periodic table, which means it has the lowest number of energy levels and electron shielding.

Sb (antimony) is located to the left of Tl (thallium) and below S (sulfur) in group 15, so it has a larger atomic radius than those elements.

Tl is located to the left of Se (selenium) in group 13, so it has a larger atomic radius than Se.

Se is located to the right of S in the same row (period), so it has a smaller atomic radius than S

Learn more about electron shielding here:

https://brainly.com/question/29977062

#SPJ11

The pH of a 1 M solution of HSbF is 0 and, the correct answer is (b) 0.

For calculating the pH of a 1 M solution of HSbF, the given pK value of HSbF is -12.

This means that HSbF can act as a strong acid and will fully dissociate in water. The equation for the dissociation of HSbF in water is:

HSbF  +  H2O  →  SbF6-  +  H3O+

From this equation, we can see that one hydrogen ion (H+) is produced for every HSbF molecule that dissociates. Therefore, the concentration of H+ in the solution will be equal to the concentration of HSbF that dissociates.

If we assume that all of the HSbF in the solution dissociates (since it is a strong acid), then the concentration of H+ in the solution will be 1 M.

Using the equation for pH:

pH = -log[H+]

We can substitute the concentration of H+ to get:

pH = -log(1)

pH = 0

To know more about pH value, click on the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28580519

#SPJ11

Answer:

option B .the compressibility of liquids is very high

Explanation:

1. The activation energy will be lower for a catalyzed reaction than for an uncatalyzed reaction [TRUE].

2. The catalyst is used up during the reaction [FALSE].

3. The catalyzed reaction is faster than the uncatalyzed reaction [TRUE].

4. The catalyzed reaction will produce more products than the uncatalyzed reaction [FALSE].

5. The rate constant, k, will be larger for the catalyzed reaction [TRUE].

The activation energy will be lower for a catalyzed reaction than for an uncatalyzed reaction is true because catalysts lower the activation energy, making it easier for the reaction to occur. The catalyst is used up during the reaction is false because catalysts are not consumed in the reaction and can be reused.

The catalyzed reaction is faster than the uncatalyzed reaction is true lowering the activation energy speeds up the reaction, making the catalyzed reaction faster. The catalyzed reaction will produce more products than the uncatalyzed reaction is false because catalysy do not affect the equilibrium of the reaction, so the amount of products remains the same. The rate constant, k, will be larger for the catalyzed reaction is true because a larger rate constant corresponds to a faster reaction, which is true for catalyzed reactions.

Learn more about activation energy: https://brainly.com/question/28384644

#SPJ11

The equilibrium constant at 25°C for the reaction of methane with water to form carbon dioxide and hydrogen is 1.2 × 10⁻²⁰. A correct answer is option (a).

The equilibrium constant (Kp) can be calculated using the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) at 25°C. To solve for the equilibrium constant, we need to determine the concentrations of each species at equilibrium. Since we are given the standard molar Gibbs free energy of formation, we can use the following equation to calculate the Gibbs free energy change at equilibrium.

ΔG° = ΔH° - TΔS°

ΔG° = (-393.5 kJ/mol + 4(0 kJ/mol)) - (298 K)(213.7 J/K•mol + 2(130.7 J/K•mol))

ΔG° = -128.7 kJ/mol

Kp = e(-ΔG°/RT) = e(-(-128.7 kJ/mol)/(8.314 J/K•mol × 298 K)) = 1.2 × 10⁻²⁰

Therefore, the answer is (a) 1.2 × 10⁻²⁰.

Learn More about equilibrium constant

https://brainly.com/question/19340344

#SPJ4

The solubility of most organic compounds increases as the temperature of the solvent increases because higher temperatures provide more kinetic energy to the molecules.

This increased energy helps break the intermolecular forces between the organic compounds and allows them to disperse more easily within the solvent, resulting in greater solubility. Solubility is a measure of how much of a substance can dissolve in a given solvent at a certain temperature. Organic compounds are a type of chemical compound that contain carbon atoms bonded to hydrogen atoms, and they are typically found in living organisms.

When the temperature of a solvent is increased, the molecules of the solvent gain kinetic energy and move more rapidly, which increases the chances of collision with the solute molecules. This results in a higher rate of solute-solvent interactions, leading to an increase in solubility. This effect is more pronounced for organic compounds, which tend to have weaker intermolecular forces of attraction than inorganic compounds.

Therefore, an increase in temperature helps to overcome these weaker forces and allows more organic compounds to dissolve in the solvent. It is important to note that this trend is not universal and some organic compounds may exhibit a decrease in solubility with increasing temperature. Additionally, other factors such as the polarity of the solvent and the structure of the organic compound can also impact solubility.

Learn more about organic compounds here: brainly.com/question/5994723

#SPJ11