Disclosure is

O a rule or policy determined by a federal agency that applies to and will be enforced on a bank or creditor
O a legal process for renegotiating or annulling a contract with a financial business such as a bank or creditor
O payment provided to a bank or creditor for specific tasks relating to opening and maintaining a financial account
• documentation where a bank or creditor provides all important details, requirements, and policies for their accounts

According to Kathleen Dolan, one of the reasons that Congress is less popular than the presidency and the Supreme Court is because there are many Congress members while there is only one President and nine Supreme Court members.

Because there are divides in many laws, it's difficult to appease everyone, which is why Congress is so unpopular. To understand the rules changes and the power dynamics between the Speaker and committee chairs, read through the six stages of the House of Representatives. Congress is the government branch with the lowest popularity. Some imagine it as the damaged branch that needs to be fixed. But it's also the most crucial.

Learn more on laws

https://brainly.com/question/29553499

#SPJ4

Bloody Sunday began as a peaceful—but illegal—legislation by some 10,000 people organized by the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association in opposition to the British government's policy of interning suspected members of the IRA without trial.

Regulation is the procedure or result of enrolling, enacting, or promulgating laws through a legislature, parliament, or analogous governing body. regulation refers to the coaching and enactment of laws through a legislative frame via its lawmaking system. The legislative technique includes evaluating, amending, and voting on proposed legal guidelines and is involved with the phrases used inside the bill to talk the values, judgments, and functions of the proposal.

Parliament is the country wide legislature (regulation-making frame) of South Africa. As such, one among its important functions is to skip new laws, to amend current laws, and to repeal or abolish (cancel) vintage legal guidelines.

Learn more about legislation here: https://brainly.com/question/26463698

#SPJ4

The following ideals of democracy are Limited government.

No Accomplishment Bill or Ex Post Act shall be passed. No poll tax or other direct tax shall be imposed except in proportion to the census or enumeration provided herein. No taxes or duties are levied on exports from any state.

Habeas corpus privileges shall not be suspended except in cases of mutiny or aggression required by public safety. No Accomplishment Bill or Ex Post Act shall be passed. The Constitution expressly denies governments the power to impose export taxes. Taking private property for public use without payment of just compensation. Prohibit freedom of religious speech press and assembly.

Learn more about Democracy here:- https://brainly.com/question/22468379

#SPJ4

The national voting age in New Zealand will be lowered from 18 to 16, Prime Minister announced.  She made her declaration after Supreme Court decided that denying 16 and 17-year-olds.

Although Ardern stated that she personally supports decreasing the age, a 75% supermajority of parliamentarians would need to approve for the change. Even the supporters admit they do not yet have the numbers. The question of lowering the voting age is being debated in a number of nations. Several countries, like Austria, Malta, Brazil, Cuba, and Ecuador, let citizens vote at 16 years old. Sanat Singh, co-director of the Make It 16 campaign in New Zealand, expressed his utter delight at the court's ruling. It's a significant day, he remarked. Not just for our campaign, but also for the nation, this is historic.

learn more about new zealand here:

https://brainly.com/question/26211549

#SPJ4

We will make 100 years of advancement in the next 25 years, and 20,000 years of progress in the following 100 years, according to Cowper (2003), who also describes the law of accelerating returns.

One of the earliest recognized commissioned policewomen in Chicago, Illinois, was Marie Owens in 1890. Portland, Oregon's Lola Baldwin became the first woman to receive a police commission in 1908.

Civilian oversight panels are designed to give community members a voice and increase transparency and accountability through an independent review and investigation of cases involving excessive force and complaints from the general public about improper conduct by police.

To know more about Cowper visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/934461

#SPJ4

Answer:

Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.

Explanation:

Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.

Answer:

The Necessary and Proper Clause or the Elastic Clause

Explanation:

Elastic Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18:

"[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

Judicial activism supporter's are Chief Justice John Roberts, became one of the most prominent proponents and Judicial restraint supporter's are Thomas Jefferson, Learned Hand and Hugo Black.

A philosophy of judicial interpretation, or how judges interpret the law, is known as judicial restraint. Definitions fluctuate a little bit from source to source, like the majority of abstract ideas. Judicial restraint is the idea of a judge not introducing his or her personal preferences into court cases and decisions. Judicial activism is a method of using the court review process or a term used to describe a specific judicial decision in which the judge was seen as being more inclined to rule on constitutional questions and to invalidate legislative or executive measures.

learn more about Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ4

Option B is correct. False, doctrine of caveat emptor does not mean that the law may be justifiably used to restrict the freedom of individuals for their own good.

About Caveat Emptor

Latin phrase "Let the buyer beware" is caveat emptor. It is now a part of English idiom. The contract law concept known as caveat emptor often governs the selling of real estate just after date of closure, though it could also apply to the sale of other types of products. Because purchasers frequently know less about the product or service they are buying than the seller, the phrase "caveat emptor" and its usage as the disclaimer of the warranties are a result. This characteristic of the circumstance is referred to as "information imbalance." Defects in the product or service might only be apparent to the seller and concealed from the buyer.

To know more about caveat emptor:

brainly.com/question/28084786

#SPJ4

Southern politicians justified seceding from the union and creating the confederate states of America by stating that the states had voluntarily joined the Union and the had the right to leave it too.

About confederate states of America

From February 8, 1861, to May 9, 1865, Confederate States of America (CSA), sometimes known as the Confederate States, Confederacy, and simply "the South," was an unrecognised breakaway republic in North America. The Confederacy was made up of American states that had secessionist policies and fought the Union during  American Civil War. Dixie, or eleven U.S. states, proclaimed secession and made up the majority of the CSA. They were North Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and South Carolina. During the occupation by the Union forces, Kentucky and Missouri also declared their secession and had proper representation with in Confederate Congress.

To know more about confederate states of America:

brainly.com/question/14372354

#SPJ4

While holding your instruction permit you may practice driving with any licensed adult 25 years of age or older.

Thus the correct answer is C.

Refer here to learn more about instruction permit: https://brainly.com/question/7934886

#SPJ4

The California gross income of Jamar and Natasha is $97,000. The correct response is option (A).

Gross income in California includes what you are paid as a salary and wages, as well as gratuities, pensions, interest, and dividends that are taxed, capital gains from mutual funds (on Form 1099-DIV, Box 2a).

Gross income is the total of all earnings, profits, interest payments, rent, and other sources of income that families and individuals get before any deductions or taxes. It differs from net income, which is calculated by deducting from gross income all applicable taxes and other deductions.

The income portion of the federal form 1040 is duplicated here. There are no more changes to CA 540NR. Jamar and Natasha's combined gross income in California is therefore $97,000.

To know more about California gross income, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28879319

#SPJ1

The exclusionary rule was brought into an enforcement for the purpose of punishment of public officers if they presented illegally obtained evidence into a criminal hearing. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.

The exclusionary rule of the legal and justice system can be referred to or considered as the regulation that prohibited the presentation of an illegally obtained evidence and presenting it into the criminal hearing. Non-compliance with this regulation also meant that the officers presenting the evidence were being severely punished with respect to the same.

Learn more about the exclusionary rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/12239906

#SPJ4

In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court decided that racial discrimination in accommodations was permissible. After 58 years, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. The Board of Education of Topeka (1954) that racial accommodations were fundamentally unfair and therefore unconstitutional.

Evidently, the US Supreme Court did not consider this when it rendered its decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896. The Supreme Court upheld segregated areas for blacks and whites as long as they were treated equally, a ruling that would stand for nearly 60 years before being overturned.

Ferguson set a precedent in 1896. The "separate but equal" doctrine was used by the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that racial segregation was constitutional.

To know more about court rulings visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14566452

#SPJ4

Congress uses open hearings to keep an eye on administrative behavior. In some cases, Congress can also exert control over the bureaucracy by revising the law and making changes to the budget in order to provide those charged with carrying out its policies more guidance.

Both a collection of non-elected leaders and an administrative policy-making body are referred to as bureaucracies.

A bureaucracy, historically, was a form of government administration where departments were run by non-elected people. Any significant institution today, whether it is privately or publicly held, is governed by bureaucracy.

Bureaucracy is exemplified by the public administration in many jurisdictions and sub-jurisdictions, but it may also be seen in any institution with a centralized hierarchical structure, such as hospitals, academic institutions, commercial businesses, professional societies, social clubs, etc.

Many pundits have suggested that bureaucracy are necessary in today's society. Whether bureaucrats should be independent or directly answerable to their political overlords is the first conundrum.

Learn more about  bureaucracy, here

https://brainly.com/question/3950164

#SPJ1

The statement is accurate. A functional democracy depends on positions like county tax assessor and justice of the peace.

An assessor, sometimes known as a tax assessor, is a hired or elected representative tasked with figuring out the value of each taxable property in a county, municipality, or township in the United States.

Tax revenue is essential for governments to function. Real estate, personal property, and income are assessed for taxes by the federal, state, and local governments.

To know more about Justice visit:-

brainly.com/question/978006

#SPJ4

Patron-librarian privilege is not a recognized legal privilege. Any person or group who visits the library physically or electronically to use its resources is referred to as a library patron. This person or group must have paid the library's yearly membership fee.

The term "library patron" refers to a person or group who has paid the library's yearly membership fee in order to borrow materials from it or to access its resources online or in person. It also refers to circulation records that contain information about identifiable people.

During the French Revolution, librarians had full charge of choosing books for the nation's citizens to read. As a result of this action, the idea of modern library service—the democratic extension of library services to all members of society, regardless of income or education—was put into practice.

To know more about Privilege visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/25657425

#SPJ4

If a bill is submitted to the president within 10 days of the end of the congressional session and he/she takes no action on the bill this is referred to as a pocket veto, the bill does not become law.

The veto is the president's authority to reject a bill or joint resolution and halt its passage into law. A measure enacted by Congress must be signed by the president within 10 days. In the case of a conventional veto, the President sends the piece of legislation back to the house where it was first introduced, usually with a message outlining his or her reasons. Only a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House is required to override this veto. In this case, despite the President's objections, the bill becomes a law. When Congress adjourns during the ten-day timeframe, a pocket veto happens. The bill cannot be sent back to Congress by the president.

Learn more on law

https://brainly.com/question/29553499

#SPJ4

The scenario is an example of The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime .

Option C is correct .

A person who is a member of a country and has rights because he was born or entitled to it, or lives in a particular city.

Concerned Citizens are participating members of the political community. Citizenship is obtained by fulfilling national, state, or local legal requirements. A state grants its citizens certain rights and privileges. In return, concerned citizens are expected to obey the laws of their country and defend the country against enemies.

Being a concerned citizen of a country has many legal advantages, such as voting rights, the right to hold public office, social security, health services, public education, permanent residency, and property rights, depending on the country. Around including land, or employment.

Learn more about concerned citizen :

brainly.com/question/25656843

#SPJ1

Police agencies use license plate readers (plus) to identify vehicles owned by persons of interest or those who pose a threat to law enforcement.

Law enforcement is the activity of some members of government who act systematically by detecting, deterring, rehabilitating, or punishing those who violate the rules and norms of society. The term includes police, courts, and correctional facilities.

Law Enforcement describes the agencies and officials responsible for enforcing the law, maintaining public order, and managing public safety. Law enforcement's primary responsibilities include identifying, arresting, and detaining individuals suspected of committing crimes.

In its modern form, US police departments have four primary responsibilities. law enforcement, crime prevention, providing emergency response, and providing support services.

Learn more about Law enforcement  https://brainly.com/question/24324910

#SPJ4

One study found that community service was directly related to reductions in recidivism.

Community service is unpaid labor done by an individual or group of individuals without payment for the benefit and advancement of their local area. Volunteering and community service can be distinguished from one another because the latter may be required while the former isn't necessarily done voluntarily.

In any way you can, you may help your community by engaging in community service. You might be helping a homeless animal, cleaning up a park, or working at a soup kitchen. Whatever the case, helping others gives you a valuable sensation.

Read more on community service here: https://brainly.com/question/13713505

#SPJ1

Answer:

Innocent

Explanation:

If you go into a family disturbance and assume only 1 person guilty and the other completely innocent, there is a chance you could be wrong. The person who claims to be innocent, and you think is innocent could have potentially instigated this crime. Or maybe they could have done something in the past that was a crime against the guilty person, that caused the whole disturbance. So there is always the potential that the case can have fault on both sides.

-Hope this helped.

Option A is correct. It is true that under the Statute of Frauds, land includes physical objects permanently attached to it, such as buildings, fences, trees, and soil.

About Statute of Frauds

A legal principle known as the statute of frauds mandates that certain kinds of transactions be completed in writing. The law covers agreements involving the sale of real estate, transactions involving items valued at more than $500, and agreements lasting a year or longer.

The statute of frauds were predominantly established in the United States as common law, or unwritten law. In most states, since then it has been institutionalised by statutes. The defendant may assert it as a defence in the breach of contract proceeding when the statute of frauds is relevant.

In fact, for the defence to be effective, they frequently must do so positively. In this situation, the plaintiff has the burden of proof.

To know more about Statute of Frauds:

brainly.com/question/6806950

#SPJ4

In a market-directed economy, businesses work to create monopolistic markets for both their existing products and any new ones they introduce.

The choices made by the economy's numerous producers and consumers at the micro level serve as the foundation for macroeconomic decisions. They presumptively believe that a customer's decision to buy a product, rather than an aggressive sales team, drives a sale.

The fundamental goal of the market-driven economic system in the United States is to fulfill consumer requirements as they are perceived by the customers. Customer satisfaction: based on individual expectations and aspirations.

To know more about monopolistic markets visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29407851

#SPJ4

UETA provides uniform rules governing electronic commerce transactions. It establishes a legal foundation for the use of electronic communications in transactions where the parties have agreed to deal electronically.

UETA puts both electronic and paper-based trade on a same legal basis and recognizes the usage of electronic communications and records.

For "electronic records and electronic signatures relevant to transactions," which are not covered by the Uniform Commercial Code, UETA regulations are principally applicable (UCC). The legislation aims to encourage standard electronic transaction regulations throughout the states while facilitating and promoting business and governmental activities by authenticating and permitting the usage of electronic records and signatures. It is also intended to comply with other relevant laws.

To know more about electronic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28116151
#SPJ4

According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the duration of the delay, the causes of the delay, the appellant's assertion of the right to a prompt review and appeal, and prejudice are the four (4) criteria that should be taken into consideration by the courts.

Held: The defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial cannot be established by any rigid criteria; rather, it can only be evaluated on an as-needed basis by weighing the prosecution's and the defendant's actions.

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, specifically the right of defendants, was the subject of the United States Supreme Court case Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).

To know more about U.S. Supreme Court visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/224703

#SPJ4

Yes, Drug Cartels should be labeled terrorists and be subject to drone strikes and limited civil rights protections. They should be labelled terrorists and be subjected to drone strikes and limited civil rights protection because they are major financiers of the terrorist groups.

Also, the United Nations has recognized the connection between both groups and to safeguard the lives of many and ensure peace in our world, they should be labelled terrorists.

A terrorist is an individual who employs violence, especially murder and bombing, in order to achieve political aims. Terrorism, in its general sense, is the application of criminal violence to inject or institute a state of terror or fear, popularly with the intention to achieve political or religious aims.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. The fact that they finance criminal violence to achieve political or religious goals is enough evidence to prove or label them as terrorists.

learn more about terrorists: https://brainly.com/question/510393

#SPJ1

Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act, which prohibited Guantanamo prisoners from filing habeas corpus petitions in federal courts to request their release, was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Marbury v. Madison decision.

Without a congressional act, the President is not permitted to establish military commissions. Five officers must make up the board of a military commission rather than a single federal judge.

Weeks v. United States provided the first explanation of the exclusionary rule (1914). The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in that case that the Fourth Amendment's safeguard against unauthorized searches and seizures should be interpreted to prohibit using incriminating evidence that was obtained unlawfully.

To know more about Military Commissions Act visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/6327433

#SPJ4