Could I get some help with this? Thanks! Here’s the question to go along with it.

For each diagram, calculate the value of x. Show your work and include an explanation of what you used (definitions and theorems) to solve the problem. If not possible, state why.

Answer:

21cm

Step-by-step explanation:

A=(b*h) /2-->h=(2*A)/b-->

h=(2*273)/26-->

h=21 cm

Answer:

One rose bush costs $6

One pot of ivy costs $5

Step-by-step explanation:

Set up an equation:

Variable x = cost of rose bushes

Variable y = cost of pots of ivy

3x + 3y = 33

12x + 4y = 92

I will use substitution to first solve for x:

3y = 33 - 3x

Divide both sides by 3

y = 11 - x

Substitute y value for 11 - x:

12x + 4(11 - x) = 92

Use distributive property

12x + 44 - 4x = 92

Combine like terms

8x + 44 = 92

8x = 48

Divide both sides by 8

x = 6

Solve for y by plugging in 6 for the x value:

3(6) + 3y = 33

18 + 3y = 33

3y = 15

Divide both sides by 3

y = 5

Check work:

3(6) + 3(5) = 33

18 + 15 = 33

33 = 33

Correct

Answer:

18/25

Step-by-step explanation:

2/100: left alone. You can reduce the answer later.

7/10: Multiply numerator and denominator by 10

7*10 = 70

10*10 = 100

Result: 70/100

Now add

2/100 + 70/100 = 72/100

Now reduce. Top and bottom can be divided by 4

72/4 = 18

100/4 = 25

Answer 18/25

Answer:

The conclusion, since the null hypothesis was not rejected, is that the proportion of readers of the newsletter who own a Rolls Royce is significantly close to 0.6.

Step-by-step explanation:

A newsletter publisher believes that 60`% of their readers own a Rolls Royce.

This means that the null hypothesis is: [tex]H_{0}: p = 0.6[/tex]

That is, that the proportion of their readers who own a Rolls Royce is of 0.6.

A testing firm believes this is inaccurate and performs a test to dispute the publisher's claim.

The alternate hypothesis is: [tex]H_{a}: p \neq 0.6[/tex]

After performing a test at the 0.020.02 level of significance, the testing firm fails to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim?

The conclusion, since the null hypothesis was not rejected, is that the proportion of readers of the newsletter who own a Rolls Royce is significantly close to 0.6.

Use the sine function.

sine = opposite side of triangle divided by the hypotenuse.

Here is the set up:

sin(50°) = BC/3

sin(50°)/3 = BC

Use your calculator to simply left side.

Take it from here.

Answer:

500

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9.2 ([tex]\sqrt{85[/tex][tex]\sqrt{85}[/tex])

Step-by-step explanation:

square root of (8-(-1))^2 + (2-4)^2) which is square root of 85 which is approximately 9.2 rounded to the nearest tenth

Answer:

9.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0step by step explanation because no blue in the bag

Answer:

-5 and -3

Step-by-step explanation:

The larger number is 67 while the smaller number will be 19 for the given condition.

The number system is a way to represent or express numbers.

A decimal number is a very common number that we use frequently.

Since the decimal number system employs ten digits from 0 to 9, it has a base of 10.

As per the given,

Suppose the larger number is x while the smaller number is y.

Sum will be as x + y = 86

The larger number is nine less than four times the smaller number.

x = 4y - 9

By substitution,

4y - 9 + y = 86

5y = 95

y = 19

x = 86 - 19 = 67

Hence "For the specified condition, the greater number is 67 and the smaller number is 19".

For more about the number system,

https://brainly.com/question/22046046

#SPJ2

Answer:

a-1. The predicted price of a house with ocean views and square footage of 2,000 is $411,500.00.

a-2. The predicted price of a house with ocean views and square footage of 3,000 is $531,500.00.

b-1. The predicted price (in $1,000s) of a house without ocean views and square footage of 2,000 is $358,900.

b-2. The predicted price of a house without ocean views and square footage of 3,000 is $478,900.00.

c. The correct option is An ocean view increases the value of a house by approximately $52,600.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

yˆ = 118.90 + 0.12x + 52.60d ………………. (1)

a-1. Compute the predicted price (in $1,000s) of a house with ocean views and square footage of 2,000. (Round intermediate calculations to at least 4 decimal places. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

This implies that we have:

x = 2,000

d = 1

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

yˆ = 118.90 + (0.12 * 2000) + (52.60 * 1) = 411.50

Since the predicted price is in $1,000s, we have:

yˆ = 411.50 * $1000

yˆ = $411,500.00

Therefore, the predicted price of a house with ocean views and square footage of 2,000 is $411,500.00.

a-2. Compute the predicted price (in $1,000s) of a house with ocean views and square footage of 3,000. (Round intermediate calculations to at least 4 decimal places. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

This implies that we have:

x = 3,000

d = 1

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

yˆ = 118.90 + (0.12 * 3,000) + (52.60 * 1) = 531.50

Since the predicted price is in $1,000s, we have:

yˆ = 531.50 * $1000

yˆ = $531,500.00

Therefore, the predicted price of a house with ocean views and square footage of 3,000 is $531,500.00.

b-1. Compute the predicted price (in $1,000s) of a house without ocean views and square footage of 2,000. (Round intermediate calculations to at least 4 decimal places. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

This implies that we have:

x = 2,000

d = 0

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

yˆ = 118.90 + (0.12 * 2000) + (52.60 * 0) = 358.90

Since the predicted price is in $1,000s, we have:

yˆ = 358.90 * $1000

yˆ = $358,900.00

Therefore, the predicted price of a house without ocean views and square footage of 2,000 is $358,900.00.

b-2. Compute the predicted price (in $1,000s) of a house without ocean views and square footage of 3,000. (Round intermediate calculations to at least 4 decimal places. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)

This implies that we have:

x = 3,000

d = 0

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

yˆ = 118.90 + (0.12 * 3,000) + (52.60 * 0) = 478.90

Since the predicted price is in $1,000s, we have:

yˆ = 478.90 * $1000

yˆ = $478,900.00

Therefore, the predicted price of a house without ocean views and square footage of 3,000 is $478,900.00.

c. Discuss the impact of ocean views on the house price.

Since the coefficient of d in equation (1) is 52.60 and positive, and the predicted price is in $1,000s; the correct option is An ocean view increases the value of a house by approximately $52,600.

Answer:

1) True

2)False

3)True

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

50.27

452.39

0.79

Step-by-step explanation:

A=πr2=π·42≈50.26548

A=πr2=π·122≈452.38934

A=πr2=π·0.52≈0.7854

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x1 = 0.5 x2 = -0.4 y1 = 1.3 y2 = -1.3

[tex]\sqrt{(x2 - x1)^{2}+(y2 - y1)^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(-0.4 - 0.5)^{2}+(-1.3 - 1.3)^{2}[/tex]

=2.75

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

85% of fasteners = conforming

10% of fasteners = downgraded

5% of fasteners = scrap

In a sample size of 500 fasteners

410 = conforming , 55 = downgraded,

The true percentage actually differ from 85%, 10%, and 5% as shown below

                               Observed Expected

conforming                 410                  500*0.85 = 425

Downgraded               55                  500*0.10 = 50

Scrap                            35                  500 * 0.05 = 25

Test statistic

determine the test statistic

= [ (410 - 425)2 / 425 + (55 -50)2 / 50 + (35 - 25)2 / 25 ]

chi-square statistic. = 5.0294

Answer:

what grade is this?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

previous monthly salary is R 308,550 and increment is R 21,450

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the previous monthly salary be x

Current salary = R 330,000

Percent increase = 6,5%

Increase = 6.5% * 330,000

Increase = 0.065 * 330,000

Increase = Rs21,450

Previous salary = 330,000 - 21,450

Previous salary = 308,550

Hence previous monthly salary is R 308,550 and increment is R 21,450

The answer is  4.25 miles

Answer:

19 ppg

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Image 1

Step-by-step explanation:

To answer this question, we need to know how to use a box plot.

I've attached an image that demonstrates this well and can teach you what each part of the box plot means.

Specifically, the 2 farthest dots at the end are the minimum and maximum. The two sides where the box starts are the lower and upper quartiles. Finally, the line in the middle of the box is the median.

With this, we can analyze each box plot and determine which one is correct.

Box Plot 1: Everything is plotted correctly- Maximum and minimum plotted correctly, median plotted correctly, upper and lower quartile plotted correctly.

Box Plot 2: Everything plotted correctly EXCEPT maximum of 48 is represented at 46.

Box Plot 3: Everything plotted correctly EXCEPT the upper quartile of 45 is at 39.

Box Plot 4: Upper quartile represented at 39 and maximum represented at 46 are both incorrect.

Answer:

Agree with u98888888888

Answer:

i agreee

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

84

Step-by-step explanation:

First you need to find the area of the square. You have to multiply 4x10 which is 40. So now you have to find the area of the triangle. To do that you have to use this equation base x Height/2. Basically 6 times 3.5 is 21/2 so its 10.5. Since you have 2 triangles you can just multiply by 2 which is 42 so 42 + 42 is 84

Answer:

(0,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is (0,1)

Answer:

Laura has been adding $50 to her savings every month which means the equation would be 200 + 50 for each month that she has been adding  to her saving account, Laura has been putting money in her saving for nine months since each month shes adding $50, The similiarties are that they both opened an account with $200 but the differences is that Laura has been adding $50 and Lauras brother has been adding a different amount as Laura.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-5-1

Step-by-step explanation: