After 100 spins, Lincoln calculated the probability that he would spin a prime number to be 0.35. Using the
spinner, what is the theoretical probability of spinning a prime number?
An 15

Answer:

A number is multiplied by 7 and the added to 10 and it is equal to when -3 is multiplied by the same number and then 2 is taken away. Find the number.

Step-by-step explanation:

interpretation: 7x+10=-3x-2

Answer: length times width divided by 2

Step-by-step explanation: it's half a rectangle

Answer:

3 • 74509

I this is right

Answer:

2 x + 3 y

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x= -730/363

Step-by-step explanation:

9x-6=729×3(x+2) multiply

9x-6=2187(x+2) remove the paranthesis

9x-6=2187x+4374 move the terms

9x-2187x=4374+6 collect like terms calculate

-2178x=4380 divide both sides

Answer:

x

Step-by-step explit can only be a function if every input has its own output

Answer:

C. Y=4/25x

Step-by-step explanation:

If y varies directly as x, tis is expressed as;

y ∝ x

y = kx

k is the constant of proportionality

Goven

y = 16/5 and x = 20

16/5 = 20k

16 = 100k

k = 16/100

k = 4/25

Substitute k = 4/25 into the original equation

y = kx

y = 4/25 x

Hence the required expression is y = 4/25 x

Answer:

A. Dennis can complete less than 24 questions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the remaining number of questions to be completed.  He can complete each of them in 5/2 minutes each; this gives us the expression 5/2x.

He has already spent 10 minutes; this gives us 5/2x+10.

He has less than 70 minutes to spend; this gives us the inequality

5/2x+10<70

Subtract 10 from each side:

5/2x+10-10 < 70-10

5/2x < 60

Divide both sides by 5/2:

5/2x÷5/2 < 60÷5/2

x < 60/1 ÷ 5/2

To divide fractions, flip the second one and multiply:

x < 60/1 × 2/5

x < 120/5

x < 24

Answer:

Dennis can complete fewer than 24 questions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-7/10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

you got you must be so Mad rn that I'm not helping you with your question Jiggle what you going to do with that big old behind

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]x = 16[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]log_{16}(x) + log_4(x) + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

Required

Solve for x

[tex]log_{16}(x) + log_4(x) + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

Change base of 16 and base of 4 to base 2

[tex]\frac{log_2(x)}{log_2(16)} + \frac{log_2(x)}{log_2(4)} + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

Express 16 and 4 as 2^4 and 2^2 respectively

[tex]\frac{log_2(x)}{log_2(2^4)} + \frac{log_2(x)}{log_2(2^2)} + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

The above can be rewritten as:

[tex]\frac{log_2(x)}{4log_22} + \frac{log_2(x)}{2log_22} + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

[tex]log_22 = 1[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]\frac{log_2(x)}{4*1} + \frac{log_2(x)}{2*1} + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4}log_2(x) + \frac{1}{2}log_2(x) + log_2(x) = 7[/tex]

Multiply through by 4

[tex]4(\frac{1}{4}log_2(x) + \frac{1}{2}log_2(x) + log_2(x)) = 7 * 4[/tex]

[tex]log_2(x) + 2}log_2(x) + 4log_2(x) = 28[/tex]

[tex]7log_2(x) = 28[/tex]

Divide through by 7

[tex]\frac{7log_2(x)}{7} = \frac{28}{7}[/tex]

[tex]log_2(x) = 4[/tex]

Apply the following law of logarithm:

If [tex]log_ab = c[/tex] Then [tex]b = a^c[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]x = 2^4[/tex]

[tex]x = 16[/tex]

Answer:

1.5 repeating

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-8n+64

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

m= -1/7

b=2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 28

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

it is .28

Step-by-step explanation:

ayepexs

Answer:

2.31 and 3.31

Step-by-step explanation:

since .81 is repeating, we can assume .31 does too

Answer:

Can you show the pie chart please.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

show pie chart

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6a - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

4 - 3(-2a + 2)

4 + 6a - 6

6a - 2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Proof:

If:

x intercept is at a number nonzero "a"

so the point where it intersects the x-axis is at (a,0)

y-intercept is at the same nonzeronumber "a"

so the point where it intersects the y-axis is at (0,a)

Then:

slope between point (a,0) and (0,a) is m= (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) = 0-a/a-0=-a/a= -1

x intercept is 2 (for example)

so the point where it intersects the x-axis is at (2,0)

y-intercept is 2

so the point where it intersects the y-axis is at (0,2)

slope between point (2,0) and (0,2) is m= (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) = 0-2/2-0=-2/2=-1

Answer:

26

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

91.44

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3 ft = 91.44 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to convert 3 ft to cm.

So we need a conversion factor.

Multiplying 3 ft by (12 in / 1 ft results in 36 in (this is equivalent to 3 ft).

Next, we convert 36 in to cm:

36 in    2.54 cm

-------- * ------------- = 91.44 cm

   1           1 in

Answer:

When The Number Of Units Sold On November 21 Is 36, The Ending Inventory On November 30 Is 3. When The Number Of Units Sold On November 21 Is 8, The Cost Of Merchandise Sold On November 21 Is 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

so 4

can i have brainliest

Answer:

the answer is 100% = 21

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

This function doesn't make sense, unless you make it f(t)=225(1.23)^x. I will assume that you forgot to add the x squared. The rate of decay is 23%. Since the base is between 1 and 0, it is an exponential decay and you'll need to subtract the r-value with 1. (If it were an exponential growth, you would have to add 1.) The initial value or the a-value is 225.

Answer:

(4, 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

since y=1/2x-1 in the first equation, you can substitute it into the second one:

1/2x - 1 = -x + 5

then add x to both sides:

3/2x - 1 = 5

then add 1 to both sides:

3/2x = 6

then divide both sides by the fraction to get:

x=4

then you substitute 4 into y=1/2x - 1

y = 1/2(4)-1

y = 1

so your answer is x=4 and y=1

Answer:

neither

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

They are congruent bc they are the same size and shape

Answer:

Congruent by SAS

Step-by-step explanation:

As given by the diagram, we have two congruent sides already. From the set of parallel lines, we see that two angles are congruent because they are corresponding. Luckily, this angle falls between the two congruent sides, which gives you the proof of SAS.