Case where you have experienced that the law can contribute to a harmonious and peaceful society
Answer:
A woman being robbed in a small town, the law can punish the person accountable and it adds to a more peaceful society.
Explanation:
By defining the punishment for each crime committed it minimizes crime rate and consequently improves peace and harmony.
In Edmonton, Alberta, Ian is assigned to foot patrol of one neighborhood. The residents know him because he is always seen walking the streets, stopping into local businesses, and generally keeping an eye out for any issues. If residents see something suspicious, they immediately phone Ian because they know him and trust that he will take care of it quickly. The program that Ian is involved in is an example of what? A. specific deterrence B. community policing C. due process method D. police-community relationship program
Ian participates in a program that is an example of community policing. As a result, option (B) is the proper response. Positive interaction, problem-solving, and collaboration of the significant tactical parts of community policing.
What is community policing?Community policing is an organizational philosophy that encourages the methodical use of problem-solving and partnership tactics to address the underlying conditions that lead to public safety issues like;
Social disorderCrimeFear of crimeCheck out the link below to learn more about community policing;
https://brainly.com/question/19755869
#SPJ1
Answer: community policing.
Explanation: i took the quiz and got my answer wrong so it showed me the correct answer!
Which did NOT cause the colonists' grievances against the British
government?
O The Navigation Acts of 1651
The Stamp Act of 1765
O The French and Indian War
O
The Proclamation of 1763
Answer:
Explanation:
Which did NOT cause the colonists' grievances against the British
government?
O The Navigation Acts of 1651
The Stamp Act of 1765
O The French and Indian War
O
The Proclamation of 1763
Is Miranda v. Arizona a case law ??
Answer:
Explanation:
Arizona, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 1966, established a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody.
Research and compare and contrast both of the following topics:
1. A successful marriage (10+ years) and an unsuccessful marriage (ended in divorce)
2. Child custody situation siding with the mother and one siding with the father
please help find
Explanation:
Juices Company has available two kinds of food Juices: Orange Juice and Juice. The company produces Atwo types of punches: Punch A and Punch B. One bottle of punch A requires 20 liters of Orange Juice and 5 liters of Grape Juice.1 Bottle of punch B requires 10 liters of Orange Juice and 15 liters of Grape Juice.
From each of bottle of Punch A a profit of $4 is made and from each bottle of Punch B a profit of $3 is made .Suppose that the company has 230 liters of Orange Juice and 120 liters of Grape JuiceGrape available.
Required:
Formulate this problem as a LPP
How many bottles of Punch A and Punch B the company should produce in order to maximize profit?
What is this maximum profit? (solve it using both the graphical and Simplex method)
Which of the following are examples of a witness authenticating evidence? (Select all that apply.)
He testifies that he was present at the time and place of the crime.
She testifies that she overheard a witness discussing evidence.
He testifies about the origin and relevance of physical evidence.
She testifies that she was the author of the document being used as evidence.
Answer:
He testifies that he was present at the time and place of the crime, and He testifies about the origin and relevance of physical evidence.
49. China has indicated that it may invade and forcefully unify Taiwan, who is a strong U.S. business partner. U.S. ________ ________over that last several decades has over that last several decades has.
A. Foreign policy
B. Military policy
C. Asia policy
D. Pacific policy
The United States, option (A): foreign policy over the last several decades relations between Taiwan and the United States became unofficial and informal during the Communist Party of China's leadership as "China" in 1979.
What is the relationship between the United States and Taiwan?Despite the fact that the US does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, we have a strong unofficial relationship and a long-term interest in sustaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
A policy of deliberate ambiguity in the United States (US) foreign policy toward Taiwan is necessary to maintain cross-strait relations and, if possible, to protect Taiwan from the People's Republic of China invasion, whereas a policy of comprehensive clarity on Taiwan would likely provoke the People's Republic of China challenges and opposition to the United States (US) legitimacy in East Asia and beyond.
Check out the link below to learn more about US foreign policy;
https://brainly.com/question/19393069
#SPJ1
Molly is a director and ned is an officer of online education inc. liability for the torts of employees
under their supervision may extend to
o a molly and ned.
b. molly only
o c ned only
o d. none of the choices.
Under the supervision of both of these parties, the liability for the tort may fall under a molly and Ned.
What is the torts of employees?
This is a term that has to do with the wrongful act in the work place that could cause an employee to take an action against an employer.
The tort of the employee could be due to harassment or action s of discrimination in the workplace.
Read more on torts here: https://brainly.com/question/988936
#SPJ1
How are georgia supreme court justices selected?
a. they are elected by the voters of georgia
b. they are selected by the existing justices
c . they are voted on by the senate only
d. they are approved by the house of representatives
What is the name of the report of a grand jury investigation, which usually includes a recommendation of indictment
Answer:
Presentment.
Explanation:
What is the name of the report of a grand jury investigation, which usually includes a recommendation of indictment - presentment.
why was the civil rights act of 1964 not enough to cause change
Answer:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended discrimination in the workplace. Being discriminated against in the application process on the basis of race, color, or national origin was not allowed. However, the law did not address voting harassment and many other barriers faced by African Americans (such as poll taxes which limited the participation of blacks in elections).
what amendment did ex-confederate states have to ratify before they could re-enter the union?
Answer: 14th amendment
A refugee means any person who?
Answer:
A refugee is placed person who has crossed national boundaries
Explanation:
Basically immigrant.
What are the two most common settings for legitimate non-compete agreements?
Mary is stopped for speeding and receives a ticket. she denies that she was speeding and chooses to go to court. which court would listen to mary's case?
The Traffic Court is the court that would listen to Mary's case.
What is a Traffic Court?This is a judicial process that was establised to handle traffic ticket cases. In
That is, people that are charged by police officer can plead guilty and pay the indicated fine directly to the court house.
Therefore, the Traffic Court is the court that would listen to Mary's case.
Read more about Traffic Court
brainly.com/question/22640490
#SPJ4
after reading an online story about a new security project being developed on the military installation where you work, your neighbor asks you to comment about the article. you know that this project is classified. how should you respond?
I shouldn't do an article about the security project being developed because it might be a problem for me if they find out I accessed a classified document.
What is a classified document?Classified documents is a term to refer to a series of documents and secret information that should not be revealed and that is stored in databases or places under strict security measures to prevent anyone from accessing it.
According to the above, the best option for me is not to write or comment on my discovery about the security project developed in the military installations where I work because it could cause me problems.
On the other hand, if I reveal the classified information that I looked at, I can expose the new security plan, jeopardizing the security of the place because this project is still incomplete.
Learn more about classified information in: https://brainly.com/question/25817763
#SPJ1
A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.
Question:
A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.
Answer:
Notary
Case law examples that demonstrate system failure of one of the 3 branches of the criminal Justice system and led to consequences
Answer:
The U.S. Constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law). The Framers structured the government in this way to prevent one branch of government from becoming too powerful, and to create a system of checks and balances.
Answer:
Explanation:
Under this system of checks and balances, there is an interplay of power among the three branches. Each branch has its own authority, but also must depend on the authority of the other branches for the government to function.
U.S. v. Alvarez is an excellent example of how the three branches each exercise their authority.
In a Nutshell
The Legislative Branch – Congress – passed the Stolen Valor Act of 2005, punishing those who misrepresent that they have received high military honors.
The Judicial Branch – the Supreme Court of the United States – ruled in 2012(link is external) that the Act was unconstitutional because it infringed on the right to free speech protected by the First Amendment.
The Executive Branch – the Pentagon and the President – took action within a month of the Supreme Court's decision establishing a government-funded national database of medal citations – phased in over time – to enable verification of military honors.
The Legislative Branch – Less than a year after Alvarez was decided, Congress responded with legislation that sought to remedy the constitutional problems in the 2005 legislation, which the Supreme Court decided in U.S. v. Alvarez were in violation of the First Amendment.
The new legislation continues the prohibition on false claims of military honors in instances outside the protection of the First Amendment. However, the Stolen Valor Act of 2013 narrowed the original legislation in the following ways:
Repealed the prohibition against wearing such awards without legal authorization.
Limited the prohibition to wearers who act "fraudulently" and "with intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit."
Limited the prohibition to the Congressional Medal of Honor and certain, specified decorations or medals.
Who was the soldier that was destroyed in the bomb blast in the introductory story? What was the “silver lining” the commander noted?
Answer:
The "Silver lining" was. "At least, when a robot dies you don't have to write to it's mother." The soldier was an EOD Soldier.
Explanation:
I hope this helps!!
The taking back of an offer by the offeror is called
Answer:
revocation
Explanation:
uestion 15 (3 points)
A couple alter the number on a lottery ticket to match the previous night's winning
number. Which crime did they commit?
A couple that alter the number on a lottery ticket to match the previous night's winning number has committed the crime of forgery. Read below about an act of forgery.
What is forgery?The action of forging a copy or imitation of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art. Forgery is a first grade crime that generally refers to the false making or material alteration of a legal instrument with the specific intent to defraud anyone.
Therefore, the correct answer is forgery.
learn more about forgery: https://brainly.com/question/19889568
#SPJ1
In a movie, a bomb detonates, and the entire room explodes. what does this most likely demonstrate?
a. the blast effect
b. a substrate control
c. a molotov cocktail
d. vapor concentration
Answer:
A) the blast effect
Explanation:
give me brainliest if its correct, hope it helps :)
15. Which of the following statements best indicates how the Electoral College benefits small states most?
A. Only nine states - California, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Blinois, Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey, and Florida - contain over half the population of the United States.
B. Vermont has 2% of the U.S. population but has control of 6% of the electoral votes.
C. Each state has at least three electors.
D. States with a greater population send more electors to the electoral college.
E. The number of electors each state has fluctuates with population shifts.
The following statements best indicate how the Electoral College benefits small states most States with a greater population send more electors to the electoral college. Thus the correct option is D.
The United States Constitution created a mechanism called the Electoral College to choose the winner of the presidential election. Each state is given a specific number of electors under the Electoral College system depending on its population.
To balance the authority between big and small states, the Electoral College was created. Small state populations are able to have a bigger impact on the outcome of the presidential election since each state is guaranteed a specific number of electors, regardless of its size.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about the population, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27991860
#SPJ1
46. A ______________is a special individual retirement account where you pay taxes on money going into your account, and then all future withdrawals are tax free.
A. IRA
B. 401k
C. Roth IRA
D. 403b
Answer:
A Roth IRA is a special individual retirement account where you pay taxes on money going into your future account, and then all future withdrawals are tax-free.
1. What is a Perimeter?
the distance around the edge of a shape
Explain the process that economist use to conduct a cost benefit analysis for a high speed rail
Answer:
The procedure is straightforward. Identify, quantify, and total the related benefits and costs for each decision or path in consideration. The benefit-cost ratio for that particular decision is then calculated by dividing the overall benefits by the total expenses.
Explanation:
List 6 assaultive-type crimes, the elements required to prove the crime, and an example of each
Assaults :
Verbal - Sam makes threats to Nyla.
Simple - Jill attempts to spit on Ally.
Aggravated - Jack hits Tom with a weapon.
Physical - Charlie slaps Amanda
Battery - Brooke violently breaks a beer bottle on the bar and holds it menacingly while yelling at James
Elements :
Physical Contact
Intent
Apprehension of a Battery
Intent to Cause Apprehension
Apprehension of Imminent Harm
is it illegal to have something hanging from your rearview mirror
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it is, since who knows what you could be hanging...
Explanation:
1. Retainer amounts may be put toward fees, costs, or both.
a. True
b. False
Describe the relationship between the different levels of legislation most relevant to the Correctional environment. Refer to both primary and secondary legislation.
Answers:
Primary legislation is an Act that has been passed by the Parliament. Secondary legislation can make small changes to an Act. The Act must say what changes can be made to it by secondary legislation and what process the secondary legislation will follow.
This article aims to provoke the reader into thinking about the relationship between primary and secondary law in the Philippines, as it emerges from the case law of the Philippines Court of Justice. The main aim is to illustrate the effect whichthe passage of secondary legislation (regulations, directives, etc.) may have onthe case law of the Court interpreting primary law (both the Treaties andgeneral principles of Philippines law) In Fact Most lawyers would, at first blush, assume thatthere is a simple hierarchical relationship between primary and secondary law,that primary law does and should take priority over secondary law, and that the adoption of secondary legislation should not affect the way in whichprimary law is interpreted. Political scientists on the other