In both defending and aiding the Holocaust, the Nazis' use of the phrase "exterminate" was crucial.
What does it mean when the Nazis refer to eradicating all Jews by using the phrase "exterminate"?The use of the phrase "exterminate" by the Nazis to describe eliminating all Jews is significant because it symbolizes a purposeful and organized effort to degrade Jews and legitimize their mass slaughter. This word was employed by the Nazi government as part of a larger campaign to denigrate Jews and persuade the German populace that they posed a threat to the state, along with other forms of propaganda and demeaning language. The Nazis were able to foster an environment of tolerance and collaboration that aided in the genocide by presenting the killing of Jews as essential for the survival of the German nation. The term "extermination" is also a reflection of the chilly, impersonal aspect of the Nazi death machine, which intended to eradicate.
To know more about Nazi visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3855932
#SPJ1
According to Monroe, in what areas would the United States not interfere with European interests?
A. already existing colonies held by the European powers
B. areas held by the United States
C. areas bordering on the United
States
D. Latin American countries that had declared independence
Answer:
The Monroe Doctrine, which was first articulated by President James Monroe in 1823, stated that the United States would not interfere with existing European colonies or European affairs in general, but would oppose any further colonization or intervention in the Western Hemisphere by European powers. Essentially, the doctrine asserted that the Americas were off-limits to European powers seeking new colonies or expansion of existing ones and that any such efforts would be considered a threat to the security and peace of the United States. So, the United States would not interfere with European interests in Europe or other parts of the world, but would not allow them to extend their influence in the Americas.
Explanation:
What can you say about the current political system? is the qualification suficient
The current political system is relatively insufficient as with growing economy and societal responsibilities more qualified politicians are needed.
Depending on the nation and the historical, cultural, and economic context, political systems can differ significantly. While some nations have authoritarian systems others have democratic ones. Others have parliamentary systems, while some have presidential ones.
A political system, in general, refers to the collection of institutions, laws and protocols that control a nation's political activities. The effectiveness of a political system can also be significantly influenced by the qualifications of the politicians and leaders. It is crucial to remember that credentials do not ensure effective leadership or positive political outcomes.
Learn more about political system at:
brainly.com/question/30814255
#SPJ1
50 points pls help me
Answer:Just look it up that's what i did and i got it right "that's how we do it"
Explanation:
The Holocaust
In the documentary Witness to the Holocaust, Miles Lehrman, a Holocaust survivor, argues, "A perpetrator is not the most dangerous enemy. The most dangerous part is the bystander because neutrality always helps the killer."
Read the text of the speech The Perils of Indifference: Lessons Learned from A Violent Century, by Elie Weisel.
Using what you have learned in this unit on the rise of the Nazis and the Holocaust, support, refute or modify Lehrman’s statement in a formal argumentative essay.
Introduce a precise claim, and develop it fully, using relevant and sufficient evidence from your readings on the Holocaust and other related texts from the unit. In your writing, distinguish your claim from alternate or opposing claims, and establish clear relationships among your claim, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Your essay should be at least 5 paragraphs in length.
The Holocaust was one of the most brutal and horrifying events in human history. It was a systematic extermination of Jews, homosexuals, disabled people, and others who were deemed undesirable by the Nazi regime.
Many people were involved in the Holocaust, including the perpetrators, the victims, and the bystanders. In the documentary Witness to the Holocaust, Miles Lehrman argues that bystanders were the most dangerous part of the Holocaust because neutrality always helps the killer. While this statement may seem harsh, it is a valid argument that can be supported by evidence.
Bystanders played a crucial role in the Holocaust. They were not directly involved in the killing, but they allowed it to happen by remaining silent and indifferent. The bystanders included ordinary citizens, government officials, and even some members of the Jewish community who chose to collaborate with the Nazis. They were not necessarily evil, but they were indifferent to the suffering of others. They failed to take action, even when they knew that innocent people were being murdered. In many cases, the bystanders were motivated by fear or self-interest. They did not want to risk their own lives or careers by opposing the Nazi regime.
To know more about Holocaust , here
https://brainly.com/question/12962
#SPJ1
Reflection about A story A low art
Answer:
"A Low Art" is a thought-provoking story that explores themes of art, creativity, and the value of human life. The story centers around a group of artists who create sculptures using human bones, and the moral and ethical questions that arise from their work.
One of the main themes of the story is the idea that art can be both beautiful and disturbing. The sculptures created by the artists are described as both hauntingly beautiful and deeply unsettling, blurring the lines between what is considered "high" and "low" art. This theme raises important questions about the role of art in society, and whether or not it should be judged solely on its aesthetic merits.
Another important theme in the story is the value of human life. The fact that the artists are using human bones to create their sculptures raises ethical questions about the treatment of the dead and the commodification of human remains. The story forces the reader to confront their own beliefs about the sanctity of life and the responsibilities we have to those who have passed away.
Overall, "A Low Art" is a thought-provoking and challenging story that raises important questions about the nature of art and the value of human life. It forces the reader to confront their own beliefs and values, and leaves a lasting impression long after the story has ended.
Which statement correctly describes one cause of the Great Depression?
A. The economy suffered when consumer spending rose sharply.
B. The economy struggled because of high interest rates that
prevented investment in small businesses.
C. The economy was weakened by an uneven distribution of wealth.
D. The economy was weakened when the Federal Reserve gave loans
to suffering banks.
'The economy was weakened when the Federal Reserve gave loans to suffering banks', correctly describes one cause of the Great Depression. The right answer is D.
The Great Depression, lasted from 1929 to 1941. Other causes, such as the Fed's passivity followed by overreaction, as well as the 1929 stock market crash, also had a role in the Great Depression. The Fed sparked the quick expansion that came before the collapse by raising the money supply and keeping interest rates low over the course of a decade.
The stock market and real estate booms were greatly inflated by the expansion of the surplus money supply. Following the market crisis, the Fed reversed course and reduced the money supply by almost a third. Many small banks experienced serious liquidity issues as a result of this cut, which dashed hopes for an expedited recovery.
The correct answer is option D.
Know more about Great Depression here
https://brainly.com/question/29771180
#SPJ1
In the song "What's Going On," how does the singer show that society is going
through troubled times during the 1960s and 1970s?
A. By talking about people dying and crying
B. By talking about people getting along
C. By talking about President Johnson's Great Society program
D. By talking about people having little food and few job
opportunities
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. By talking about people dying and crying.
In the song "What's Going On," Marvin Gaye portrays the societal issues of the 1960s and 1970s, such as the Vietnam War, racial injustice, poverty, and environmental degradation. The lyrics talk about people dying and crying, with lines like "Brother, brother, brother / There's far too many of you dying," and "Picket lines and picket signs / Don't punish me with brutality."
Gaye's lyrics also address the need for unity and compassion among people, which is apparent in lines like "We don't need to escalate / You see, war is not the answer / For only love can conquer hate." Overall, "What's Going On" is a powerful social commentary on the troubled times of the 1960s and 1970s, and it remains relevant today.
By talking about people dying and crying is the singer to show that society is going through troubled times during the 1960s and 1970s. Hence, option A is correct.
What is the focus of Marvin Gaye's album What's Going On?The documentary "What's Going On" examined the forces reshaping American culture during the start of the 1970s, when idealistic hippie ideals collided with the harsh reality of poverty, confusing war, drug consumption, and racial prejudice. Gaye didn't yell or make any demands.
Ava Ames, who portrays the video's female lead, is a psychology student at Oklahoma State University. The male lead, Jack Lewis, is a Southern California high school junior.
American musician Siedah Garrett wrote the song "Everchanging Times". For Charles Shyer's 1987 romantic comedy Baby Boom, written by Burt Bacharach, Bill Conti, and Carole Bayer Sager, the song was produced by Bacharach, Bayer, and David Foster.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more information about What's Going On, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11810682
#SPJ5
Select the correct answer.
What idea did George Washington introduce as president of the United States?
A.
The US president's first two years should be the most productive.
B. US presidents should play an important role in maintaining world peace.
C.
US presidents should not belong to any political party.
D. US presidents should run for election for only two terms.
How did this acquisition benefit the United States in the early twentieth century?
A. By showing other nations the advantages of Dollar Diplomacy
B. By securing U.S. presence in the Pacific Ocean
C. By demonstrating naval superiority in the Caribbean Sea
D. By proving to other nations that the United States would enforce the Open Door Policy
The acquisition that benefited america within the early 20th century by securing its presence in the Pacific Ocean was the acquisition of Hawaii. Therefore option B is correct
The annexation of Hawaii in 1898 supplied the united states with a strategic region within the Pacific, which allowed for expanded exchange and navy presence within the vicinity. the acquisition of Hawaii also furnished a valuable coaling station for U.S. ships journeying to and from Asia.
The strategic location of Hawaii might show to be even greater vital throughout world conflict II, because it served as a key army base and deliver center for the U.S. Pacific fleet. accordingly, the acquisition of Hawaii supplied vast strategic and monetary advantages to america in the early twentieth century.
Learn more about annexation of Hawaii:-
https://brainly.com/question/8862840
#SPJ4
Which Vietnamese government did the United States support during the Vietnam War? South North
Answer:
communist government
Explanation:
hope it helps
What are 5 interesting facts about Martha Washington?
I need 4th grade sentences!!
pls
Question refers to the excerpt below.
"The application of the Order … is quite plain and simple in cases where women are employed to replace men on jobs which are not changed. Where the plant management, in order to meet the necessity of replacing men by women, has rearranged or lightened the job … a study of job content and job evaluation should afford the basis for setting 'proportionate rates for proportionate work.' Such questions require a reasonable determination, by collective bargaining or arbitration, of the question whether, or how far, the newly arranged job is of equal quantity and quality with the old job … Whether a job is performed by men or women, there may be a dispute over correctness of its wage rate in relation to rates for other jobs in the same plant."—From the National War Labor Board Press Release, No. B 693, June 4, 1943, in "Chapter 24: Equal Pay for Women," The Termination Report of the National War Labor Board: Industrial Disputes and Wage Stabilization in Wartime, January 12, 1942–December 31, 1945, vol. I, 290–291
The text is an example of which of the following?
Demands made by the growing women's suffrage movement
Effects of mass mobilization for World War II
Increased opportunities in manufacturing for new immigrants
Streamlined processes in manufacturing
Option (),b The book serves as an illustration of the effects of widespread mobilization in World War II.
Exactly where does mobilization fit into the Second World War context?Throughout the conflict, mobilization provided minorities and women with opportunities to raise their financial status while also igniting debates over racial segregation. When Japanese Americans were detained, for instance, civil liberties faced challenges as a result of the war.
What actually happens when "mobilization for war" occurs?Military mobilization for any sort of conflict includes the choosing of locations, the building of buildings for training and other military uses, the purchase and distribution of weapons, ammunition, uniforms, equipment, vehicles, and stores, as well as the instruction of military personnel.
Learn more about racial segregation: https://brainly.com/question/30036344
#SPJ1
Question 4 of 20
All of the following factors affect the level of wages except which of the
following?
OA The actions of labor unions.
B. The production possibilities frontier.
C. The law of supply and demand.
D. Minimum-wage laws.
SUBMIT
Answer: B: The production possibilities frontier.
Explanation:
the data can be manipulated to observe how scarcity, growth, inefficiency, efficiency, and other factors can affect productionProduction possibilities frontier can be defined as a graph or curve which shows the combinations of two goods that are produced when the resources of the economy are fully utilized.Group of European settlers known for being skilled soldiers; brought to Georgia to help defend against Spanish colony to the south
Germans blamed the newly formed ___ government for their troubles. Desperate for a new leader, they turned toward the ____ to restore Germany’s lost glory.
Germans blamed the newly formed Weimar government for their troubles. Desperate for a new leader, they turned toward the Nazi Party to restore Germany’s lost glory.
Why is it?
After World War I, Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, which imposed harsh penalties on Germany, including large reparations payments, loss of territory, and limitations on its military.
These penalties caused widespread economic hardship in Germany and contributed to the perception among many Germans that the Weimar government was weak and ineffective.
In this context, the Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler, gained popularity by promising to restore Germany's former greatness and by blaming the country's problems on various groups, including Jews, communists, and liberals.
Ultimately, the Nazi Party rose to power and established a totalitarian regime in Germany, which would lead to the atrocities of World War II.
To know more about World War related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
According to Darwin, how are new species created?
to germany who posed the greatest threat and why
The two major powers that posed a threat to Germany during the period leading up to World War II were the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom.
What was the reason?
The Soviet Union, under Stalin's leadership, was seen as a threat due to its ideology of communism, which was viewed as a direct threat to Nazi Germany's fascist ideology.
The United Kingdom, on the other hand, posed a threat due to its strong military and economic power, which could potentially challenge Germany's own ambitions of expansion in Europe.
Additionally, the UK's close alliance with France and other European powers made it a formidable opponent to Germany's expansionist goals.
To know more about Germany related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1061130
#SPJ1
complete question:
Who posed the greatest threat to Germany during the period leading up to World War II and why?
PLS HURRY!! LOTS OF POINTS
Question refers to the excerpt below.
"And whereas great Quantities of the like Manufactures have of late been made and are daily increasing in the Kingdom of Ireland and in the English Plantations in America and are exported from thence to Forreigne Marketts heretofore supplyed from England which will inevitably sink the Value of Lands and tend to the ruine of the Trade and the Woollen Manufactures of this Realme … Be it enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same:
That no Person or Persons … shall directly or indirectly export … out of or from the said Kingdom of Ireland into any Forreigne Realme States or Dominions … other than the Parts within the Kingdom of England."—Wool Act, 1699
Which response reflects the status of colonial exports after the enactment of policies such as Wool Act of 1699 by England?
Decimated by English taxation
Engaged in risky smuggling
Stagnating due to piracy
Thriving through salutary neglect
Answer:engaged in risky smuggling
Explanation:
reflects the status of colonial exports after the enactment of policies such as the Wool Act of 1699 by England. The Wool Act of 1699 was intended to restrict the export of woolen goods from the American colonies and Ireland to foreign markets, in order to protect the English woolen industry. This led to increased smuggling activities by colonists who sought to bypass the restrictions and continue exporting their goods to foreign markets.
Analyze the foreign and domestic policies of Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Clinton.
The foreign and domestic policies of Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Clinton are quite extensive and complex. It would be difficult to summarize them in a few sentences. However, I can provide you with some resources that can help you understand their policies better. Here are some links to their Wikipedia pages:
Foreign policy of the Ronald Reagan administration
Foreign policy of the George H. W. Bush administration
Foreign policy of the Bill Clinton administration
I hope this helps!
Three very different presidents—Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan—served the country during a time of significant transition. Their differing political philosophies and the difficulties they encountered as presidents were reflected in their international and domestic policies.
Ronald Reagan: Reagan was a conservative Republican who supported personal freedom and small government. He was also a fervent opponent of communism, and when he was president, he fought to weaken the Soviet Union. Reagan's foreign policy was based on the idea that the US should have a robust military and use its influence to advance freedom and democracy around the world.
George H.W. Bush was a centrist Republican who served as Ronald Reagan's vice president before taking office as the nation's leader. Compared to Reagan, he was a more circumspect foreign policy figure who prioritized preserving global peace and stability. Bush also made an effort to normalize relations with the Soviet Union and had a significant role in the START negotiations.
Bill Clinton: Prior to becoming president, the Democrat held the office of governor of Arkansas. He was a moderate Democrat who supported both a robust economy and a liberal social agenda. Clinton's foreign policy prioritized multilateralism and international collaboration.
Additionally, he sought to strengthen NATO and advance democracy in the former Soviet Union.
The United States was significantly impacted by the domestic and foreign policies of Reagan, Bush, and Clinton. They influenced the nation's priorities both domestically and internationally. Although their policies are still contested today, they nonetheless have an impact on how the United States is run.
To know more about Presidents:
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ2
What is the correct definition of Quechua? Native American group that lives in Paraguay healer in Bolivia surviving language of the central Andes traditional Argentine food
Quechua refers to Native American ethnic group and language family that primarily lives in Andean region of South America, including parts of Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, Chile, and Argentina.
What is an ethnic group?An ethnic group is a community of people who share a common culture, history, language, religion, or other characteristics that distinguish them from other groups. Members of an ethnic group often see themselves as a distinct and unique people with a common identity and sense of belonging. Ethnicity is a social construct that can be based on a variety of factors, including geography, migration patterns, and historical events. Ethnic groups can vary in size from small, localized communities to large, dispersed populations. They can also be defined by different levels of social, economic, and political power within a society. The concept of ethnicity is important in understanding diversity and the ways in which different groups interact with one another.
To learn more about ethnic group, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29774102
#SPJ1
QUESTION ONE: What conclusions can be drawn about the early New Deal from the attached political cartoons? Explain at least four conclusions.
QUESTION TWO:
Use Theodore Roosevelt's "New Nationalism" speech and Woodrow Wilson's "What is
Progress" speech to compare and contrast their respective understanding of Progressivism. In
what ways were their views similar and in what ways were they different? Find and explain two
examples for each.
Answer:
Theodore Roosevelt's "New Nationalism" speech and Woodrow Wilson's "What is Progress" speech were both delivered during the Progressive Era in the early 20th century in the United States. While both Roosevelt and Wilson were prominent figures of the Progressive movement, their understanding of Progressivism had both similarities and differences.
Similarities:
Emphasis on government intervention: Both Roosevelt and Wilson believed that the government should play an active role in addressing social and economic issues. Roosevelt argued for a strong federal government that could regulate big business and protect the rights of workers and consumers. Wilson, on the other hand, saw the government as a force for social justice and advocated for government intervention to curb the power of monopolies and ensure fair competition.
Example from Roosevelt: "We grudge no man a fortune in civil life if it is honorably obtained and well used. It is not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community."
Example from Wilson: "What we seek is the reign of law, based upon the consent of the governed and sustained by the organized opinion of mankind."
Focus on economic and social reforms: Both Roosevelt and Wilson supported progressive reforms aimed at addressing social and economic inequality. They both believed in the need for policies that would protect the rights and well-being of ordinary Americans, particularly those who were disadvantaged or marginalized.
Example from Roosevelt: "The burden of taxation should be distributed more equitably. I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and in another tax which is far more easily collected and far more effective—a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes."
Example from Wilson: "We are all caught in one great economic system, and what affects one of us affects all of us. We have come more and more to understand that fact, and to act upon it. It is because of that understanding that we are putting the machinery of society at the service of justice."
Differences:
Role of government: While both Roosevelt and Wilson believed in government intervention, they had different views on the extent and scope of government's role. Roosevelt advocated for a more robust and powerful federal government that would regulate big business and protect the rights of workers and consumers. Wilson, on the other hand, emphasized the need for limited government intervention, with a focus on individual freedom and states' rights.
Example from Roosevelt: "We stand for the rights of property, but we stand even more for the rights of man."
Example from Wilson: "I want a government which will aim to do justice to all classes and groups of men... It is because I believe in these things that I am not afraid to face what must be faced."
Approach to reform: Roosevelt and Wilson differed in their approaches to achieving progressive reforms. Roosevelt advocated for a more aggressive and assertive approach, while Wilson preferred a more cautious and gradual approach, working within the existing political system to bring about change.
Example from Roosevelt: "We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community. This, I know, implies a policy of a far more active governmental interference with social and economic conditions in this country than we have yet had."
Example from Wilson: "The other great need is in dealing with that very difficult problem of monopoly...I believe that the effort to deal with it should proceed cautiously, with full knowledge of all the facts and the soberest appreciation of the difficulty of the task."
Choose a Greek achievement or accomplishment and explain why you think it was ancient Greece's most important contribution to Western culture.
Answer:
One of ancient Greece's most important contributions to Western culture is its philosophy, particularly the work of philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. Greek philosophy marked a turning point in Western thought, as it introduced new ways of thinking about the world, ethics, politics, and human nature.
Plato's philosophy, for example, emphasized the importance of reason and logic in understanding the world and the human condition. His theory of Forms or Ideas posited that there are ideal, eternal, and unchanging concepts that exist beyond the physical world, and that knowledge of these forms is essential to understanding reality. This idea influenced later Western philosophers and thinkers, including the likes of Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant.
Similarly, Aristotle's philosophy emphasized the importance of empirical observation and scientific inquiry in understanding the natural world. He believed that knowledge must be based on evidence and observation, rather than pure speculation or belief. Aristotle's ideas about logic, ethics, politics, and metaphysics had a profound influence on Western philosophy and thought for centuries to come.
In addition to their philosophical ideas, the Greeks also developed many other cultural achievements that continue to shape Western culture. For example, the Greeks made important contributions to art, drama, literature, architecture, and science. They developed new styles of sculpture, created dramatic plays that explored complex themes and emotions, wrote epic poems and philosophical treatises, designed buildings and temples that were both beautiful and functional, and made significant scientific discoveries in fields like mathematics, physics, and astronomy.
Overall, I believe that Greek philosophy, and the work of philosophers like Plato and Aristotle in particular, was ancient Greece's most important contribution to Western culture because it laid the groundwork for many of the key ideas and principles that have shaped Western thought and civilization ever since.
Explanation:
Which statement best completes the diagram?
?
The Mexican-American
War begins.
A. Texas votes to outlaw slavery throughout its territory.
B. The U.S. military attacks Buena Vista and Mexico City.
OC. Mexico invades U.S. territories in California and Texas.
D. Mexico refuses to sell California to the United States.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Just did it
Review the map.
A map titled Nazi Invasion of Western Europe. Arrows go from Germany and Luxembourg to Netherlands, Belgium, France, and Switzerland.
What does the map show about the Low Countries (Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands)?
They gave Nazi troops a defensive position against Switzerland.
They provided the Nazis with a quick route to its ally, Italy.
They provided an easy way for the Nazis to enter France.
They established a direct connection to the Soviet Union.
The map titled "Nazi Invasion of Western Europe" shows that the Low Countries (Luxembourg, Belgium, and the Netherlands) C. provided an easy way for the Nazis to enter France.
What did the low countries do ?The arrows on the map indicate the direction of the German invasion of Western Europe, with German troops entering France from the north via Belgium and the Netherlands.
This was one of the reasons why Germany decided to defeat and occupy the Low Countries, so that they would be able to get around French fortifications on the border with France.
Therefore, the correct answer is "They provided an easy way for the Nazis to enter France."
Find out more on Nazi Germany at https://brainly.com/question/20533600
#SPJ1
Write a biography about Martha Washington.
I need 4th grade sentences.
Answer:
Martha Washington was born on June 2, 1731 in Virginia. She grew up on a plantation with her family. When she was 18 years old, she married her first husband, Daniel Parke Custis. Together they had four children, but only two survived to adulthood. After her husband died, she married George Washington. Martha was nice and kind. She also helped care for soldiers during the Revolutionary War. Martha Washington was a beloved First Lady.
Explanation:
NEED HELP PLS!!!
DIRECTIONS: Write an essay about what you want to learn about the Spanish expedition in the Philippines. Your essay must consist of seven to ten (7-10) sentences.
How did the Watergate Scandal create a constitutional crisis? *
A)It allowed the people to have a voice in the trial
B) It challenged the checks and balances in place for the executive branch
C)It limited the power of the judicial branch
D) It created a new controversial amendment
Question 6 of 10
Which of the following were some of the goals of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009?
A. Save existing jobs, increase federal funding for unemployment
benefits, and increase economic activity.
B. Establish Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security programs.
C. Find those responsible for the economic meltdown and hold them
accountable.
D. Force banks to lend money to poor people in low-income
neighborhoods in order to increase home ownership.
Answer: A. Save existing jobs, increase federal funding for unemployment benefits, and increase economic activity.
Explanation: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 aimed to provide economic stimulus in response to the financial crisis ensuing from the 2008 economic downturn. The objectives of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) entailed the facilitation of employment opportunities, the preservation of extant jobs, and the stimulation of economic expansion. The legislation encompasses stipulations for a rise in federal allocation towards unemployment compensation and infrastructure schemes, in addition to tax breaks offered to enterprises to stimulate investment in research and development. The aforementioned legislation in question did not lay the foundation for the implementation of either the Medicare or Medicaid programs. It also did not seek to impose an obligation upon financial institutions to provide loans to particular demographics. Similarly, the legislation did not seek to effectuate the establishment of the Social Security program.
you need to find what YOU believe to be the FIVE main causes of WWII. Identify what you believe to be the cause, discuss it IN YOUR OWN WORDS, and discuss WHY it was a cause. , but what I really want you to do is look back at what was happening in Europe and how the wheels of war began to move towards the most destructive war ever. ALSO, put them in the order of most important to least import
I think the main causes of World War II in Europe include the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles, the rise of fascist ideologies, the failure of diplomacy and collective security, and economic and social instability.
They created a volatile environment that led to the outbreak of the most destructive war in European history.
What are the five main causes of World War II in Europe?The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles imposed on Germany after World War I fueled a sense of injustice and resentment, contributing to the rise of Hitler.The rise of fascist ideologies, like Nazism in Germany and Fascism in Italy, led to aggressive expansionist policies that aimed to establish dominance in Europe.The policy of appeasement pursued by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany failed to stop Hitler's aggression but encouraged him to pursue his ambitions for expansion.The failure of collective security, as established by the League of Nations, to prevent aggression undermined its credibility and contributed to the outbreak of war.Economic and social instability, including the global economic depression further increased tensions and contributed to the rise of nationalism.Learn more about the Treaty of Versailles at brainly.com/question/3604628
#SPJ1
LOTS OF POINTS
Question refers to the excerpt below.
"If our great corporations would more scrupulously observe their legal limitations and duties, they would have less cause to complain of the unlawful limitations of their rights or of violent interference with their operations. The community that by concert, open or secret, among its citizens denies to a portion of its members their plain rights under the law has severed the only safe bond of social order and prosperity. Those who use unlawful methods, if moved by no higher motive than the selfishness that prompted them, may well stop and inquire what is to be the end of this."—Benjamin Harrison, from his Inaugural Address, March 4, 1889
Harrison's speech and its emphasis on the effects of corporate abuse would be a criticism of
government regulation of business
laissez-faire economic policy
socialist ideology
grassroots politics
Harrison's speech and its emphasis on the effects of corporate abuse would be a criticism of B. laissez-faire economic policy.
What is the laissez-faire economic policy?Laissez-faire economic policy is a concept that advocates for minimal government intervention in economic affairs, where the free market is allowed to operate with little or no regulation.
In his speech, Harrison is critical of corporations that do not observe their legal limitations and duties. He argues that the use of unlawful methods by such corporations undermines social order and prosperity.
Find out more on the laissez-faire economic policy at https://brainly.com/question/13873642
#SPJ1