19.
20. A major point of opposition to the league of nations was the concern that the organization would drag the united states into other europeans wars in 3-4 sentences, explain why you disagree or agree with that point.
Answers
Opposition to the League of Nations due to the concern that it would drag the United States into other European wars was not unfounded.
The United States had previously been pulled into World War I despite efforts to remain neutral, and the fear of being dragged into future conflicts was a legitimate concern.
However, it is also worth considering the potential benefits of the League in promoting international cooperation and preventing future wars.
Ultimately, the decision not to join the League weakened its ability to achieve these goals, but the concerns about being drawn into wars were not unfounded.
Learn more about World war I here:
brainly.com/question/27326515
#SPJ1
Related Questions
The allied powers chose a policy of appeasement peasement during the 1930s partly because they
Answers
Answer:
had hope of avoiding war
DZ company’s workers are all members of
Answers
There are 36 hours of community service required of every Delta Zeta member. Members who are alumni are free to haze another member at any moment.
The pink Killarney rose serves as the organization's official flower, while the diamond is its official gem. The turtle is the recognized mascot. Its official symbol is a Roman lamp.
A lamp rests atop an Ionic column with wings, and the entire design of the emblem is made of gold. A Delta Zeta is inserted in the lamp's spout, and the column's capital has four pearls encrusted into it.
The lamp is written in Greek characters. Pearls were eventually added to the emblem after it had already been created alumni ; they were initially absent.
Learn more about Delta Zeta , from :
brainly.com/question/30164287
#SPJ1
a speech of why should every citizen vote
Answers
Dear fellow citizens,
I believe that voting is one of the most important duties that we have as citizens of this country. When we vote, we have the power to shape the future of our nation, and to have our voices heard. Every person’s ballot has the power to make a difference, and that's why it’s crucial that we all vote in every election.
The right to vote is a hard-won privilege, and one that we should never take for granted. Throughout history, many people have fought and sacrificed their lives for the right to vote, and it's our duty to honor their efforts. By voting, we're not only ensuring that our voices are heard, but we're also carrying on the legacy of those who have fought before us.
In addition, voting is a way of taking responsibility for our own future. It's easy to complain about the state of our government or our communities, but unless we take action and vote for the people and policies that we believe in, we won't see any real change. By casting our ballots, we're helping to shape the future of our country and our world.
Finally, voting is a way of being a good citizen. In a democracy, we all have a responsibility to participate in the political process, and that means voting in every election. Whether you're supporting a local candidate, a statewide initiative, or a presidential campaign, your vote matters, and it's your duty as a citizen to make your voice heard.
In conclusion, voting is a fundamental right and a crucial duty of every citizen. By voting, we're taking part in the democratic process, shaping the future of our nation, and honoring the legacy of those who fought for the right to vote. So let's all make a commitment to vote in every election, and to be proud of our role as citizens of this great country. Thank you.
What was President Eisenhower’s strategy of going to the very edge of war to force the other side to back down?
A. Brinksmanship
B. Covert Operations
C. Limited War
D. Appeasement
Answers
Answer: A
Brinksmanship
based on racial formation (1994) michael omi & howard winant, why would segregation be a "racist racial project", or racism?
Answers
Omi and Winant contend in "Racial Formation in the United States" that segregation is a type of "racial project," which is a means of creating and upholding racial categories in society. As a "racial project," segregation restricts access to opportunities and resources for other racial groups while contributing to the development and maintenance of the dominant racial group's social and economic advantages.
Due to its foundation in the idea of racial hierarchy, where one race is viewed as superior to another, segregation is a "racist racial project." The practise of racial segregation is justified by the notion that some races are fundamentally distinct from others and cannot coexist in the same environment. It is based on this idea that distinct racial groups should have their own schools, neighborhoods, and even entire cities. The practise of segregation supports the idea that races should be kept apart and treated unequally and that one race is naturally superior to another.
Segregation is additionally a kind of institutional racism since it is upheld by laws and regulations that discriminate against people based on their colour. For instance, Jim Crow laws mandated segregation and prejudice against African Americans in public settings including schools, housing, and transportation in the United States. These laws were a blatant example of institutional racism and were designed in order to preserve the social, political, and economic dominance of the white majority.
As a result of its foundation in the idea of racial hierarchy, reinforcement of racial inequality, and enforcing of discriminatory laws and policies, segregation is a "racist racial project" and a type of institutional racism.
Learn more about chronological order :
brainly.com/question/26719078
3. According to these accounts, what is one effort undertaken by Japanese Americans to address their families' internment during World War II? [1]
Answers
One effort undertaken by Japanese Americans to address their families' internment during World War II was that they all cooperated, but a few broke curfew on purpose and challenged the legality of the incarceration.
What was the Japanese American internment during World War II?The attack on Pearl Harbor can be described as one that was also launched whichbrought about rash of fear about national security, and this was majorly on West Coast.
It shouldbe noted that February 1942, President Roosevelt, who was serving as the commander-in-chief, issued Executive Order that brought about internment of Japanese Americans however they challenged the legality of the incarceration.
Learn more about World War at:
https://brainly.com/question/8535233
#SPJ1
Text answer
Respond to both questions in at least two sentences
each.
.
Describe how you felt about your work in this project. For
example, you might discuss what tasks were easy for you,
or which tasks were more challenging for you.
●
Explain what new information or knowledge you learned in
this DBQ project. For example, you might discuss the new
perspectives you gained about the Progressive Era or new
perspectives you have on writing an essay, giving a speech,
or creating a storyboard.
You may choose to start your response with:
I felt... while doing this project because...
I learned... while working on this project.
Answers
In answer to the first query, my absorption in this project left me feeling simultaneously tested and rewarded.
What aspects do I prefer?While certain actions such as exploring the papers and generating a thesis were more relaxed for me; developing an argumentative essay that connected the facts from the material was notably intricate. In conclusion, I observed the task to be a beneficial experience to build up my critical thinking faculties.
Coming to the second question, completing the DBQ task provided me with insights concerning the Progressive Era. I accrued knowledge of the adjacent circumstances and various amelioration movements that affected its period, comprising the Women's Suffrage Activity and the labor movement.
Further to this, I grew a further understanding of authoring an effective argument based article by means of mining information from direct sources and positioning a succinct yet unambiguous statement.
Read more about Progressive Era here:
https://brainly.com/question/8179112
#SPJ1
if the Constitution were up for ratification today, who would win more support – the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists? Why?
Answers
Answer:
The Federalists.
Explanation:
The United States Government has expanded and continue to expand it's power over the United States constitutes. The Party that typically supports large government overreach and the overuse of governmental powers is the Democratic Party, which has ~44.7 million members based on 2017 data, as compared to 32.8 million of the Republican Party, which typically favors smaller government control among it's constituents.
~
Learn more about the Federalist and Anti-federalist parties, here:
https://brainly.com/question/22956277
Samuel Slater helped to bring the Industrial Revolution to America. What was both a positive and negative impact of his actions?
Manufacturing in the 1800s impacted the economy positively and the environment negatively.
Manufacturing in the 1800s impacted public education positively and the economy negatively.
Manufacturing in the 1800s improved Americans' standard of living but caused conflict between the U.S. and Britain.
Manufacturing in the 1800s improved transportation throughout the country but impacted international travel negatively
Answers
Samuel Slater's role in bringing the Industrial Revolution to America had both positive and negative impacts.
Samuel Slater was an English textile worker who emigrated to the United States in 1789 and helped to establish the first successful cotton spinning mill in the country. This contributed to the growth of the textile industry in America and helped to establish a new economic system based on manufacturing. One positive impact of Slater's actions was that it created new jobs and economic opportunities for many Americans, which contributed to an overall improvement in their standard of living.
However, the industrialization of America also had negative impacts. One of the most significant was the negative impact on the environment. As factories sprang up across the country, they polluted the air, water, and soil, causing environmental degradation and health problems for workers and nearby residents.
To know more about Industrial Revolution, click here
https://brainly.com/question/31444657
#SPJ1
26. During the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) China was the World's wealthiest Empire by 1820 True or false
Answers
False
During the Quing Dynasty China was one of the largest and most powerful, but it was not the wealthiest.
Explain the values/ goals of socialists?
Answers
Socialism is a political and economic system that aims to create a more equitable and just society by promoting collective ownership of the means of production and distribution of wealth and resources. The values and goals of socialism vary among different socialist ideologies and movements, but some common themes include:
Economic Equality: Socialists believe that wealth and resources should be distributed more equally among all members of society, rather than being concentrated in the hands of a small elite. This means that they advocate for higher taxes on the rich, stronger social safety nets, and more access to public goods and services.
Social Justice: Socialists are committed to promoting social justice and eliminating oppression and inequality based on factors such as race, gender, sexual orientation, and class. They advocate for policies that address systemic injustices and discrimination, such as affirmative action, anti-discrimination laws, and equal access to education and healthcare.
Democratic Control: Socialists believe that workers and communities should have more say in the decisions that affect their lives, including economic decisions. They advocate for worker-owned cooperatives, community-controlled enterprises, and democratic planning and decision-making processes.
Learn more about Socialism here:
https://brainly.com/question/28218484
#SPJ11
In terms of the volume of oil spilled and subsequent environmental damage, the wreck of the tanker Exxon Valdez was the worst tanker accident in history.
Answers
The statement was true at the time of the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989, but it is no longer accurate. Since then, there have been several other large oil spills, including the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, which is now considered the worst oil spill in U.S. history and one of the largest environmental disasters in world history. The Deepwater Horizon spill released an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico over a period of 87 days, causing extensive damage to marine and wildlife habitats, as well as significant economic and social impacts on the communities that depend on the Gulf for their livelihoods.
In 1984, how did Prime Minister Indira
Gandhi handle the Sikh nationalists in
Punjab?
A. She called for a national vote on the topic of Sikh
independence.
B. She met with Sikh nationalist leaders in order to reach
a peace agreement.
C. She declared the creation of the independent state of
Khalistan.
D. She ordered an attack at the Golden Temple to punish
the extremists.
Answers
Answer:
D. She ordered an attack at the Golden Temple to punish the extremists.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
To what extent were government policies during the First World War similar to policies implemented during te Civil War
and the Quasi War with France? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
The U.S. policy in the WW1 was greatly similar to the policy of the Civil War largely due to the spread of the U.S. ideals of Democracy.
1. PART A: Which statement best expresses a
theme in the poem?
O A. The responsibility of a journalist is to
provide solutions to social and political
concerns in a society.
O B. People who are not in influential positions
are afraid to challenge America and have
the tendency to ask powerful people to
represent them.
OC. Americans have abandoned the original
principles of welcoming immigrants
because they do not respect other cultures.
OD. Despite discrimination in America,
immigrants are not powerless and they
have the capacity to create social change.
Answers
Option (a), The remark that best captures a topic in the poem is "The duty of a journalist is to give solutions to social and political difficulties in a society."
What is the outline of the story in "The Journalist" by J. Patrick Lewis?Lewis published a poem titled "The Journalist" in his 2013 collection When Thunder Comes: Poems for Civil Rights Heroes as a tribute to the distinguished Asian American journalist Helen Zia. The speaker of this poem talks about how she utilizes journalism to solve societal concerns.
What duties are journalists owed to the general public?The responsibility of a journalist, also known as a reporter, is to acquire information, present it objectively and fairly, and then create news articles and stories based on actual events. They are entrusted for interviewing subject area experts, gathering first-hand accounts, and developing an outline into a cohesive story.
Learn more about journalist: https://brainly.com/question/10160256
#SPJ1
is this telegraph an important world war 1 document why
Answers
The purpose of the Marshall Plan was to
A. punish Germany for its role in World War II
B. keep Communist countries weak
C. help Germany form a new government
D. help Western Europe recover from World War II
Answers
Answer:
D. help Western Europe recover from World War II
The great migration began right after reconstruction and continued through the 1920s.What was a push factor for this movement to cities in the North and West
Answers
Answer: The driving force behind the mass movement was to escape racial violence, pursue economic and educational opportunities, and obtain freedom from the oppression of Jim Crow.
3. According to the Note above, what action did Johnson take regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1957?
Answers
Answer:
The Note above does not provide information on the action taken by Johnson regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
three regions and a more specific city within that region where industry was located in historically and still exists somewhat.
Answers
Here are three regions and a more particular city within each region where industry was historically based and still exists to some extent:
1. The Rust Belt region of the United States, which includes cities such as Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: This area was formerly a centre of steel production and other heavy industries, but industrial jobs have been declining since the 1970s. However, cities like as Pittsburgh have diversified their economies and attracted new industries such as technology and healthcare.
2. The Ruhr area of Germany, which includes cities such as Essen: This region has a long history of coal mining and heavy industry, but has recently evolved to a more service-oriented economy. Nonetheless, sectors such as steel manufacturing and engineering remain in the region.
3. In Japan, the Kanto area, which includes cities such as Tokyo: This region serves as Japan's economic and industrial powerhouse, with sectors ranging from electronics to car manufacture to financial services. While Tokyo is largely a financial and technological hub, surrounding areas like Yokohama and Kawasaki have a strong manufacturing presence.
Learn more about Landforms here:
brainly.com/question/28551341
I NEED HELPPPP!! GIVING BRAINIEST
Answers
Answer: it should be capitalism but it is not on it so it is probably free enterprise
Explanation:
Urban legends aren’t necessarily good or bad on their own, but they have the potential to have negative impacts. Explain one or two ways that urban legends can be harmful to an individual or society.
Answers
Here are a couple potential harms from urban legends:
• Spread of misinformation. Urban legends are false stories that become widespread, but they are presented as factual tales of things that supposedly really happened. The spread of these false stories can confuse people and undermine the truth.
• Anxiety and fearmongering. Some urban legends prey on common fears and anxieties to captivate audiences. Stories about things like poisoned Halloween candy, killer alligators in sewers, or teens dying after prank calls can stoke unnecessary fear and paranoia.
• Moral panic. Occasionally, an urban legend will capture people's imaginations and stir up a kind of moral panic. Things like the supposed "Satanic panic" of the 1980s, rumors of ritual animal sacrifice, or claims of gang initiations gone wrong can lead to panic and hysteria that is disproportionate to the facts.
• Blame and harm. Rarely, an urban legend may single out a specific group for blame or paint them as a threat, fueling hostility toward them. For example, stories of minorities spiking Halloween candy or teens dying after prank calling certain number combinations can promote blame of marginalized groups. This type of narrative can conceivably inspire real-world harm.
• Distraction from truth. The spread of emotive and shocking urban legends can distract from and crowd out coverage of legitimate news stories and important truths. They serve as sensationalistic clickbait, spreading misinformation.
Those are a few of the potential downsides of how urban legends can negatively impact beliefs, spread fear, lead to moral panic, promote blame, and distract from truth. Of course, most individual urban legends cause relatively little harm—but they are worth examining critically given these possibilities.
Proponents of nationalism in the mid-19c espoused?:
Answers
Proponents of nationalism in the mid-19th century espoused the belief that a nation should have its own sovereign state and that people who shared a common language, culture, history, and territory should be united under one government.
Nationalism in the mid-19th century was a response to the political and economic changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution and the rise of liberalism. Nationalists believed that a strong, unified nation-state would provide stability, security, and prosperity for its citizens. They also believed that national identity was more important than other social or political affiliations, such as class or religion. Nationalism played a significant role in the unification of Germany and Italy in the mid-19th century, as well as in the rise of anti-colonial movements in Asia and Africa later in the century.
Learn more about nationalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ11
How did the integration of Whites and Blacks helped to perpetuate inequality and racism in SA?
Answers
Answer: The integration of Whites and Blacks in South Africa was intended to bring an end to apartheid - a system of legal racial segregation that existed for decades. However, the integration process was flawed and ultimately led to the perpetuation of inequality and racism.
Explanation: Firstly, integration was carried out in a way that preserved white dominance and control over the economy. This meant that black people were integrated into white-controlled systems, rather than being given equal power in those systems. As a result, black people continued to be marginalized socially and economically.
Secondly, integration did not address the root causes of inequality and racism, such as the unequal distribution of resources and opportunities. This meant that the disparities created by apartheid were not fully corrected, and white people continued to have greater access to education, healthcare, and other resources.
Lastly, the integration process was often superficial, and did not address the deeply ingrained attitudes and beliefs that perpetuated racism in South African society. This has led to ongoing discrimination and prejudice, even after the official end of apartheid.
In conclusion, while the integration of Whites and Blacks was an important step towards ending apartheid in South Africa, it did not fully address the underlying problems of inequality and racism. As a result, these issues continue to affect South African society today.
30. Which rulers of China established the capital in Beijing in the 1200s?
Answers
Answer:
Kublai Khan
Explanation:
I think it is correct but I may be wrong.
How are Japanese Shintoism different from African Animism?
Answers
Answer: Shintoism is a religion in Japan, while animism is a belief found in some African cultures. Shintoism believes in many gods controlling various aspects of life, while animism believes that spirits exist in nature. Shintoism has a structured worship system, while animism doesn't. Shintoism emphasises harmony with nature, while animism sees humans and nature as one. They have similarities, but are different religions.
3. A single ruler that possesses and abuses absolute government power  
Answers
Answer: tryant
Explanation: i did it
Answer: tryant
Explanation: i did it
A single ruler that possesses and abuses absolute government power is a tyrant. Thus, option (b) is correct.
A tyrant is a totalitarian leader who lacks legal restraint or has usurped the authority of a lawful leader. Tyrants, who are frequently characterized as ruthless, may stand by their positions by using oppressive tactics.
Tyrant refers to an absolute dictator who ascended to power without legal authority in modern English. In Ancient Greece, a tyrant was someone who unlawfully gained sovereignty.
The term "absolute monarchy" refers to a form of government in which a king, dictator, or monarch has the final say in how the country is managed. Including economics, politics, and all other forms of authority, the monarch has total control over all facets of society.
Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on tyrant, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28390776
#SPJ6
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
A single ruler that possesses and abuses absolute government power ____.
A. Tyranny.
B. Tyrant.
C. Self-evident.
D. Usurpation.
A single ruler that possesses and abuses absolute government power is a tyrant. Thus, option (b) is correct.
A tyrant is a totalitarian leader who lacks legal restraint or has usurped the authority of a lawful leader. Tyrants, who are frequently characterized as ruthless, may stand by their positions by using oppressive tactics.
Tyrant refers to an absolute dictator who ascended to power without legal authority in modern English. In Ancient Greece, a tyrant was someone who unlawfully gained sovereignty.
The term "absolute monarchy" refers to a form of government in which a king, dictator, or monarch has the final say in how the country is managed. Including economics, politics, and all other forms of authority, the monarch has total control over all facets of society.
Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on tyrant, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28390776
#SPJ6
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
A single ruler that possesses and abuses absolute government power ____.
A. Tyranny.
B. Tyrant.
C. Self-evident.
D. Usurpation.
Please help!! It’s due today!
Answers
Foreign policy refers to a government's strategy for dealing with other countries and international actors.
Isolationism is a foreign policy approach that emphasizes avoiding alliances and involvement in international affairs.
Neutrality is a foreign policy approach that emphasizes non-involvement in conflicts between other countries.
How to explain the termsImperialism refers to a policy or ideology of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means.
Containment is a foreign policy strategy used during the Cold War to prevent the spread of communism.
Internationalism is a foreign policy approach that emphasizes cooperation and engagement with other countries.
Expansionism refers to a policy or ideology of expanding a country's territory or influence, often through the use of military force.
Interventionism is a foreign policy approach that involves active involvement in the affairs of other countries, often through the use of military force.
The Spanish-American War was a conflict between the United States and Spain in 1898, which resulted in U.S. control of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines.
Savage is a term used to describe people or cultures considered to be uncivilized or primitive.
Partisan refers to a strong supporter of a particular political party or ideology.
Self-government refers to a system of government in which the people have the power to make decisions about their own affairs.
Policy refers to a set of principles or guidelines that guide decision-making and action.
The Truman Doctrine was a policy announced by U.S. President Harry S. Truman in 1947 to provide military and economic aid to countries threatened by communism.
Communism is a political and economic system in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state or by the community as a whole.
The Cold War was a period of geopolitical tension between the United States and the Soviet Union from the end of World War II until the early 1990s.
The Berlin Airlift was a massive effort by the United States and its allies to supply the city of Berlin with food and other necessities during a Soviet blockade in 1948-1949.
The Berlin Wall was a physical barrier separating East and West Berlin, built by the communist government of East Germany in 1961.
The Vietnam War was a conflict between North and South Vietnam, with the United States and other countries supporting South Vietnam. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.
The Vietcong was a communist guerrilla force in South Vietnam during the Vietnam War.
Kuwait is a small country in the Middle East, bordered by Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the Persian Gulf.
Saddam Hussein was the President of Iraq from 1979 until 2003, when he was removed from power by a U.S.-led coalition.
Learn more about policy on;
https://brainly.com/question/2196996
#SPJ1
Is genocide a modern phenomenon?
Answers
Answer: NO
Explanation:
it has happened throughout history not just in what we equate to modern Society take the native Americans both with the US and Spain as an example in may not have been on purpose 10% of the time but there are whole ethnic groups that were wiped of the face of the map and the definition of genocide is “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” Hope this helps
What is the difference between the establishment clause and the free-exercise clause?
Answers
The Free Exercise Clause safeguards people's freedom to practice their religion without interference from the government, whereas the Establishment Clause forbids the government from creating or promoting a specific religion.
While the Free Exercise Clause defends everyone's right to practice their religion, the Establishment Clause guarantees that the government will not support any one religion or take sides in religious disputes.
The free-exercise clause forbids the authorities from intervening with your religious beliefs and their unrestricted practice, but the establishment clause forbids the government from creating its own religion and upholding it as the state's official religion.
As a result, the significance of the difference between the establishment clause and the free-exercise clause are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Establishment Clause, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29498881
#SPJ1