Women are granted federally paid maternity leave across the United States, but men are not, is the best summary of the status of paid maternity leave policy in the Unites States.
A student spends three hours and $20 at the movies the night before a test. The opportunity cost includes both the time spent learning and the money that could have been spent leave policy elsewhere. Subject to the provisions of this Act, every woman is entitled to, and her employer is obligated to, pay maternity benefit at the rate of the average daily wage for the period of her actual absence immediately preceding and including the day of her delivery.
To learn more about paid maternity, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14912122
#SPJ1
Legal document specifying what a patient would like to have done for health care if he or she becomes incapacitated and cannot make decisions; also known as a living will.
Answer: Advance Directive
Explanation:
Which of the following is a high risk area for compliance issues
Cyber Security and Data Protection is a high risk area for compliance issues. The development of technology has brought new difficulties and risks associated with compliance issues.
Although it can be challenging for organizations to consistently remain on top of these challenges, issues like risk area data protection and cybersecurity rank among the top worries in the compliance space. A campus activity (which could be a process, department, or function) is considered high risk if it poses risks to the institution's capacity to fulfil its goals and objectives, particularly those relating to compliance issues with all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures. Fraud, theft, bribery, money laundering.
To learn more about compliance issues, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/27960340
#SPJ1
Consumer protection comes from which of the following types of agencies?
Over the years, decades, and centuries, Consumer protections are developed to safeguard the public from toxic, defective, and dangerous merchandise. Food safety for instance is one consumer protection that
has been around since Biblical times.
Their area majorly three consumer protection agencies-
Consumer product safety commission(CPSC)-
Was aimed at protecting the general public “against unreasonable
risks of injuries related to shopper merchandise.”
Food and drug administration (FDA)-
The basis for controlling how food is handled and made has been with the U.S. Since the late eighteenth century.-
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-
Liable for guaranteeing the supply of meat, poultry, and egg merchandise area unit safe.
For more information over the consumer protection please refer the link below -
https://brainly.com/question/1862829
You can technically drive up to nine miles over the speed limit without getting a ticket?
Answer:
no. 2 miles over the speed limit can get you a ticket
Explanation:
Which of the following entities are responsible for implementing
guidelines or requirements for ethical and/or consenting research
experiments? Select all that apply.
IRB
ONIJ
DAS
OIRS
Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
What are IRB ethical guidelines?Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
People with expertise and training in non-scientific fields, people with expertise and training in scientific fields, and members of the community who might serve as subjects for research studies make up the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a committee.
An IRB has the power to approve, demand changes are made (to secure approval), or disapprove research in accordance with FDA regulations. The rights and welfare of human research subjects are safeguarded in large part by this group review.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a) IRB.
To learn more about IRB refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8905808
#SPJ4
The overall trend in the history of the trial courts in California has been
a. to improve services to the public by streamlining the court system
b. to create more and more courts below the superior court level
c. to reduce the number of judges in the state of California
d. to move away from the criminal cases to deciding only civil cases
The overall trend in the history of the trial courts in California has been to improve services to the public by streamlining the court system.
The Calif. Court system has 3 levels: the California Supreme Court, the Courts of attractiveness, and the Superior Courts. These courts are ruled by three distinct judicial bodies: the Judicial Council, the Commission on Judicial Performance, and the Commission on Judicial Appointments.
The California Supreme Court is the state's highest court. it's the authority to review the choices of the Courts of Appeal and its decisions are binding on all alternative California state courts. The court is seated in San Francisco and conducts sessions in l. a. and Sacramento. The Supreme Court has one justice and 6 associate justices who are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments.
The Calif. Courts of Appeals are California's intermediate courts of proceedings review. California has six appellate districts: the first proceedings District, San Francisco; 2d proceedings District, Los Angeles; the third proceedings District, Sacramento; the fourth proceedings District, San Diego; the fifth proceedings District, Fresno; and the sixth proceedings District, San Jose. The California legislative assembly apportions the number of judges for every district.
Learn more about the Court System here: https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
What are some ethical issues relating to proactive investigations and also to reactive investigations?
Some of the ethical issues relating to proactive investigations and reactive investigations includes:
whether informant testimony is reliablehow informants are compensatedhow targets of undercover investigations are chosenwhether deceptive operations entrap individuals or violate privacy rights.What is the reactive and proactive investigation?A reactive investigation refers to criminal investigations where the police respond to a crime that has already occurred while a proactive investigation refers to criminal investigation that may go on before and during the commission of the offense.
Under this Investigations, a deception is recognized as an integral part of proactive undercover investigations and may include use of placebos and blue, accepted, tolerated, deviant lies etc. Other Informants as well assist the police by providing information about criminal activity in return for a reward such as money or reduced/dropped charges.
Read more about investigation
brainly.com/question/12186978
#SPJ1
what are human rights
Answer: the rights that everybody deserves
Explanation:
Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Answer:
are desires that people have or strive.
The last act test is no longer in use because it makes it practically impossible for the police to prevent a substantive crime by arresting the offender for attempt.
It is a true statement that the last act test is no longer in use because it makes it practically impossible for the police to prevent a substantive crime by arresting the offender for attempt.
What is the last act test?In law, the last act test is used by looking at whether an attempt has occurred or at least by the time a person has performed all the acts believed to be necessary to commit the target offense. For instance, an attempted robbery does not occur until when the robber displays his or her gun and demands property.
So, this test is a common law test that is made to ascertain if the defendant did the final act which is necessary to commit an offense; it also helps to determines if there was an attempt of crime.
Complete words "The last act test is no longer in use because it makes it practically impossible for the police to prevent a substantive crime by arresting the offender for attempt. True/False"
Read more about last act test
brainly.com/question/20337451
#SPJ1
Succinctly explain, with reference to the relevant authorities, the principle of constitutional democracy from a South African perspective.
The Republic of South Africa is one, sovereign, democratic state founded on the following values: (َ1) Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms. (2) Non-racialism and non-sexism. (3) Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.
The Republic of South Africa is one, sovereign, democratic state founded on the following values: Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms, Non-racialism and non-sexism and Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.
What is the history of South Africa?South Africa contains some of the oldest archaeological and human-fossil sites in the world. Archaeologists have recovered extensive fossil remains from a series of caves in Gauteng Province.
The area, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, has been branded "the Cradle of Humankind". The sites include Sterkfontein, one of the richest sites for hominin fossils in the world, as well as Swartkrans, Gondolin Cave, Kromdraai, Cooper's Cave and Malapa. Raymond Dart identified the first hominin fossil discovered in Africa, the Taung Child in 1924.
Other hominin remains have come from the sites of Makapansgat in Limpopo Province; Cornelia and Florisbad in Free State Province; Border Cave in KwaZulu-Natal Province; Klasies River Caves in Eastern Cape Province; and Pinnacle Point, Elandsfontein and Die Kelders Cave in Western Cape Province.
Learn more about South Africa, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18005052
#SPJ2
Why is a strict liability tort more challenging to defend? It usually is accompanied by a separate criminal case. It is the type of tort that captures the most public attention The plaintiff does not need to prove all elements of negligence. The damages claimed by the plaintiff are impossible to measure.
In a strict liability case, whether a defendant was at fault is irrelevant. However, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's risky or inherently risky behavior caused the plaintiff to suffer damages or injuries.
What is a tort with strict liability?A legal doctrine known as "strict liability" holds a party accountable for their deeds or products without requiring the plaintiff to establish negligence or fault. Someone who engages in extremely risky activities, such as maintaining wild animals, using explosives, or producing substandard goods, may be held accountable if another person is hurt.
Strict liability crimes are distinct in that they would still hold the defendant accountable even if the defendant took the necessary precautions and followed safety regulations. The defendant should be able to anticipate that a person could be hurt by the activity given its nature.
Learn more about strict liability with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/2669139
#SPJ10
If you had to choose between a large sum of money or the option of doing what you think is best, by walking away from the money, what would you do?
If I had to choose between the two, the right decision is by walking away from the money I will be more at ease.
If I had to choose between a large sum of money or the option of doing what I think is best, by walking away from the money, I would choose the option of what I think is the best for me. It is because of the fact that if I have the liberty to take up what is best for me then it would mean I have freedom within myself and it helps me maintain my inner peace and well-being. This will be the right decision.
The option to choose what I think is the best will bring along the responsibility to choose the right option, but we should not fear the consequence. Social pressure can undoubtedly have a negative impact on our judgment, but there are times when it can also be used for good.
Read more about making the right decisions on:
https://brainly.com/question/25870371
#SPJ1
opic: Routine Activities Theory (Chapter 5)
Routine activity theory, like the related lifestyle-exposure theory, emerged as a key theoretical approach in criminology in the late 1970s. Routine activities refer to generalized patterns of social activities in a society (i.e., spatial and temporal patterns in family, work, and leisure activities). A key idea is that the structure of routine activities in a society influences what kinds of situations emerge, and changes in a society’s routine activities cause changes in the kind of situations people confront. Another key idea is that people act in response to situations (including when they commit crimes); therefore, the kinds of situations they encounter in their daily lives influence their crime involvement (and, as a result, influence a society’s crime rate), and changes in people’s exposure to situations may lead to changes in their crime involvement (and, consequently, changes in a society’s crime rate). When applied at the individual level, the routine activity approach has generally aimed to explain why a person is victimized, or offends, by explaining how his/her individual routines (lifestyles) bring him/her into contact with (or expose him/her to) situations conducive to crime. In terms of policy and prevention, the routine activity approach has mainly been linked to situational crime prevention and policing (for example, hot spots analysis).
For this discussion, consider that this theory, unlike most criminological theories, does not consider the motivation of the offender (it is assumed to exist). Instead, this theory focuses on factors like "capable guardianship" and "suitable targets" that can theoretically be impacted by individual and policy-level crime prevention strategies. Which approach (focusing on offenders versus focusing on targets) do you think has the greatest potential for reducing the crime rate? In other words, should crime prevention/reduction strategies focus on the offenders that commit crimes or the places and persons that are victims of crime?
Even though there are some approach that focus on offenders versus focusing on targets, the approach I think that has the greatest potential for reducing the crime rate is Subjective Approach.
Yes, crime prevention/reduction strategies should focus on the offenders that commit crimes or the places and persons that are victims of crime because it will help to know more about the reason for the crime.
What is a Subjective Approach in criminology?The Subjective Approach in criminology can be described as the approach that is been used in the process of solving criminal issues which encompass some factors that is needed to put in consideration when handling the criminal cases and these factors are : physical as well as the biological and mental traits because these will help to focus on the offenders and know more about them by asking and researching more information about them so as to be able handle the case.
Read more about crime at:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Identify at least five potential title problems, and explain how to solve them.
It may not be title evident who the rightful owner of a residence is due to unpaid debts, divorce, property line disputes potential, or even a simple typing error in the property records solve.
Before a seller may hand over ownership of their house to a buyer, these problems must be rectified. A title defect is an error or omission that affects the ownership rights you have to the property. When a specific flaw has been found and is documented in the potential register, qualified titles are given. Even more uncommon than possessory titles are these solve. When the deed is recorded, the public is given constructive notice of who owns the real estate.
To learn more about title, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/17137302
#SPJ1
Station 3: complete this for brainliest
(a) In order to get justice done to, it follows the sequence of steps below:
1. The first step to obtain Justice is to go to a police station to officially lay a complain about a suspect. The man in the picture E is the complainant who come to lodge a complain.
2. The second step from the picture above is picture F. In this picture it consist of an investigation scene and the arrest of the suspect.
3. The next order is the a CCTV image at the crime scene. This is an evidence. Picture D is the evidence.
4. In the fourth step, there is a presentation of evidence by that man standing. The evidence is presented in picture B.
5. The suspect, now a criminal is being investigated at the police station for interrogation. This happened in picture A
6. Finally, the criminal is being charged to the court to for judgment by the lawyer. Picture C identifies this.
(b) A testimonial evidence differs from physical evidence in that a testimonial evidence made by a witness to confirm the action of a criminal and this is done under a oath. On the order hand, a physical evidence is that evidence presented inform of image, test, object, material, fingerprint on weapon, or any other physical evidence at the crime seen.
Understanding a physical evidenceThis simply refers to any identifyable evidence which confirms that a suspect is a criminal or performed the criminal action at the the crime scene.
In conclusion, when we notice any strange behavior or action in our environment, we should first go lodge a complain in the police station.
Read more on evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/375033
#SPJ1
in elicitation, how this statement helps you in obtaining information during casual conversation, "if you know something, pretend that you know".
This statement in elicitation simply helps to gather information without directly conveying the contents .
What is elicitation and how ''pretend that you know'' helps?Elicitation is simply the means of obtaining or conveying information in expect of a response without directly throwing any questions or talks.When one wants to get more specific information from the opponent , uses the phrase if you know something pretend that you know.In elicitation it is a phenomena , a way to talk and to proceed to a ask and take the benefit behavior.By putting someone into the conversation one can predict to get the information as one wants.To know more about elicitation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11430743
#SPJ9
courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision as long as the actual amount of damages is difficult to ascertain and the sum is reasonable in light of the expected harm.
It is true that courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision if the actual amount of damages is difficult to determine and the total amount is reasonable in light of the expected harm.
A court considers two factors when deciding whether a liquidated damages provision is a penalty:
(1) the rationality of the dollar value specified and
(2) the complexity of deciding and asserting actual damages in the event of a breach.
However, a liquidated damage provision that is viewed as a "penalty" unconnected to any anticipated or actual loss is unlikely to be enforced by a court.
Learn more on liquidated damages damages-https://brainly.com/question/28498187
#SPJ4
The question was incomplete. Check below the full question.
courts will enforce a liquidated damages provision as long as the actual amount of damages is difficult to ascertain and the sum is reasonable in light of the expected harm. There are two general categories of remedies—legal and equitable.
1.2 With reference to the relevant constitutional law authorities, succinctly explain the difference between parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy from a South African perspective, with particular emphasis on the role of the judiciary in democratic South Africa.
The ultimate source of legislative power is where parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy diverge most. It is the legislature in parliamentary supremacy; it is a state's constitution in constitutional supremacy.
What is meant by parliamentary sovereignty?A notion in the constitutional law of various parliamentary democracies is parliamentary sovereignty, often known as parliamentary supremacy or legislative supremacy. It asserts that the legislative body is superior over all other governmental entities, including the executive and judicial branches. The UK constitution upholds the notion of parliamentary sovereignty. As a result, Parliament is now the supreme legal authority in the UK, with the power to enact and repeal any law. In general, its laws cannot be overruled by the courts, and no Parliament may approve legislation that cannot be altered by subsequent legislatures.The idea of constitutional supremacy accords the constitution the highest power within a legal system. Stating this principle does not merely include listing legal requirements in ascending priority. The issue is more complex than just a clash of opposing norms.Hence, The ultimate source of legislative power is where parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy diverge most. It is the legislature in parliamentary supremacy; it is a state's constitution in constitutional supremacy.
To learn more about parliamentary sovereignty refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14621416
#SPJ4
Which phrase from the Constitution gives Congress implied powers of lawmaking?
O Supremacy clause
O Due process clause
O Expressed powers clause
Necessary and proper clause
Answer:
Necessary and Proper Clause.
Explanation:
Quote Article I, Section 8, Clause 18: [The Congress shall have Power...] to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof." [Emphasis added].
~
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution is "the supreme law of the land", and that if there are conflicts of interests with future laws, that the Constitution will take priority.
The Due Process Clause establishes that the government cannot casually take away the natural rights of a citizen unless authorized by the law. Essentially, the citizen would only relinquish their rights to life, liberty, and property if they willingly break laws set by the US government.
The Expressed Powers Clause establishes the rights given to Congress, which includes the power to create taxes for citizens, and to conduct foreign relations, such as treaties, maintenance of a military for foreign affairs, and regulation on foreign trade.
~
early psychiatric theories
Answer:
There are several mental health theories, but they all come from one of five schools of thought. They are behaviorism, biological, psychodynamic, cognitive, and humanistic.
2
QUESTION 1
What is a mechanism to exchange information and intelligence, maximize resources, streamline operations, and improve the ability to fight crime and terrorism?
O a. think tank
O b. intelligence station
O c. patrol room
O d. command center
e. fusion center
A mechanism to exchange information and intelligence, maximize resources, streamline operations, and improve the ability to fight crime and terrorism is: E. fusion center.
What is communication?Communication can be defined as a strategic process which involves the transfer of information (messages) from one person (sender) to another (recipient or receiver), especially through the use of semiotics, symbols, signs and network channel.
What is a fusion center?A fusion center can be defined as an effective and efficient mechanism that is designed and developed to enhance and facilitate the complete exchange of information and intelligence between two or more agencies of government.
Additionally, a fusion center helps invested or associated parties to achieve all of the following:
Maximize their resources.Improve their ability to effectively and efficiently fight crime and terrorism.Streamline their operations.Read more on fusion center here: https://brainly.com/question/9440375
#SPJ1
When turning you should give the proper signal
The United States used sabotage to destabilize Cuba's economy and government and plotted to
assassinate Fidel Castro. Did the United States engage in state sponsored terrorism? Compare this
to Soviet support of its allies. Is there a difference?
The CIA planned to undermine Castro and his popularity with the general population by disrupting his speeches from March through August 1960.
Briefing:-Castro's reputation was to be damaged through manipulation of his conduct and appearance through the techniques devised.
What driving forces did the US employ during the Cuban missile crisis?Kennedy made the decision to erect a naval blockade, or ring of ships, around Cuba after a number of protracted and contentious talks. This so-called "quarantine," as he referred to it, was intended to stop the Soviet Union from bringing in additional military supplies. He commanded that the missiles already stationed there be destroyed, along with the missile launch locations.
When the Cuban missile crisis erupted, why did Cuba collaborate with the Soviet Union?Due to Cuba's proximity to the US, the Soviet Union counted Castro and his government as a key Cold War partner. The Soviet Union helped Cuba militarily, economically, and politically, and their relationship was primarily economic.
To Know more about popularity
https://brainly.com/question/11478118
#SPJ13
Article I, Section 2: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
Article I, Section 3: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
Which does it best represent? Choose 2
• the division of the legislature into two houses
• The Connecticut Compromise
• the election of senators by direct vote of the people
• the role of the president in carrying out the laws
• the role of the senate in approving or rejection presidential appointments
Answer:
Explanation:
lolololololololo
Critically discuss the structure and composition of south africas parliament
Answer:
ewan q sayo
Explanation:
wag mona sagutin
Research use of force by law enforcement and write briefly on the prevalence of it and what factors lead to use of force. Summarize 2-3 articles. Remember to properly cite sources used.
The use of force by law enforcement is one where people who employ state power, including police and military personnel, may use force in law enforcement activities.
This use of force is primarily due to increase in crime rate and other forms of violence.
What is the use of force by law enforcement?The public and the law enforcement community are gravely concerned about the use of force by law enforcement officials. Daily interactions between officers and the public are numerous and varied, and when necessary, an officer may use force to carry out his or her duty. Officers need to be aware of and truly appreciate the boundaries of their authority.
Only the minimum amount of force required to defuse a situation, make an arrest, or safeguard the safety of others should be used by law enforcement officials. Lethal force, less-lethal force, and basic verbal and physical restraint are all included in the continuum of levels of force that police deploy.
Therefore, Depending on the circumstance, an officer may use varying degrees of force. Guidelines for the use of force are based on a variety of variables because of this diversity, including the officer's level of training or experience.
Citations
International Committee of the Red Cross.
International Association of the Chiefs of Police, Police Use of Force in America, 2001, Alexandria, Virginia, 2001.
Learn more about law enforcement from
https://brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ1
If you suspect someone is hiding something on them and it is your duty to inspect individuals before they enter the premises, you should
If you suspect someone is hiding something on them and it is your duty to inspect individuals before they enter the premises, you should use the hot pursuit doctrine.
What is the hot pursuit doctrine?This is the term that is used to refer to a legal theory that allows police to enter a scene where they believe a crime has been committed without a warrant if waiting will put their lives or the lives of others in risk or allow the suspected perpetrator to flee; also known as fresh pursuit.
In countless crime thrillers, police officers are shown chasing a criminal at a high rate of speed while shouting into their radios that they are "in hot pursuit." This well-known photograph doesn't reveal much about the law regarding hot pursuit. according to what the U.S. Supreme Court, the rule is a significant exclusion from the Fourth Amendment's guarantee of liberties. Citizens are protected by this constitutional clause from excessive police interference into their lives and property. The Search Warrant is its primary form of protection.
Read more on [police inspection here: https://brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ1
Does an officer have discretion when it comes to traffic enforcement? If so, how? If not, why?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Police must enforce traffic laws with the utmost discretion. The decision to stop the driver or, if there are numerous drivers, which one to stop is made by the police after they spot a violation. Additionally police procedures are not always clearly defined in law, and because a community's laws may differ from current norms, discretion is also required in law enforcement.
Hope this helps! :)
2. The national committee of each party has almost unlimited power.
A. True
B. False
Answer: yes its true
Explanation:
A person or business doing business in California satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for being sued here.
true or false
A person or business doing business in California satisfies the minimum contacts requirement for being sued here is a false statement.
What is a business ?A business can be defined as an organization that carries out transactions like sending a commodity or rendering service and for that they are being paid some money.
A defendant who has few encounters with both the state is one who does not violate the principles of substantial fairness as well as fair play.
The minimum connections test is a careful balance that aims to strike a balance between the reasonableness of requiring a criminal to go to the territory of a country to argue against one complaint there and the sum of the accused's connections only with the host state.
Learn more about business , here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ1